Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 2  

Re: Terry Porter

Posted: 2/4/2013 6:01 PM

Re: Terry Porter 


doesnt have to be catchable for holding
---------------------------------------------
--- nbbuckfan wrote:

I don't think that ball was catchable last night, it was out of bounds.

In 2002, the ball was right in Gamble's hands for a TD, had he not been mugged by the Cane DB.

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 6:03 PM

Re: Terry Porter 


Yep, and that's what it was.
Kent34 wrote: doesnt have to be catchable for holding
---------------------------------------------
--- nbbuckfan wrote:

I don't think that ball was catchable last night, it was out of bounds.

In 2002, the ball was right in Gamble's hands for a TD, had he not been mugged by the Cane DB.

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 7:08 PM

Re: Terry Porter 


Doesn't really matter. One game has been over for 10 years and the other one has  been over for less than 24 hours.
Day tok er jerbs.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 7:29 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



Jamiemurt wrote: If that bum official Terry Porter was officiating last night my 49ers would have gotten that call.

HA-HA, I can't believe your pussy still hurts.  Good.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/4/2013 8:02 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



BuckSkipper wrote:
Jamiemurt wrote: If that bum official Terry Porter was officiating last night my 49ers would have gotten that call.

HA-HA, I can't believe your pussy still hurts.  Good.
+1    tongue
--------------------------------------------

A PROUD 1%'er
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/4/2013 8:06 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



AZBUCKFAN wrote:
BuckSkipper wrote:
Jamiemurt wrote: If that bum official Terry Porter was officiating last night my 49ers would have gotten that call.

HA-HA, I can't believe your pussy still hurts.  Good.
+1    tongue
+2 biggrin
Reply | Quote
  • bs2u2
  • All-Conference
  • 5430 posts this site

Posted: 2/5/2013 7:00 AM

Re: Terry Porter 


Plain and simple...the rule book was instituted for a reason and if you aren't going to use it then throw it the hell out.   I'm so sick and tired of hearing these overpaid announcers keep saying "GOOD NO CALL".  What the hell are they smoking? It's either a penalty or it isn't.
No Call my a$$.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 2/5/2013 7:51 AM

Re: Terry Porter 



Jamiemurt wrote: You guys gotta admit that the hold last night was a lot more egregious than the so called hold in the Natty in 2002...
No, I don't.  Cant help it if you're blind and stupid...
You win with people

- W. W. Hayes
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/5/2013 1:09 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



Jamiemurt wrote: You guys gotta admit that the hold last night was a lot more egregious than the so called hold in the Natty in 2002...
I have to agree with this.  They were both holds, but the SF hold was worse- not a lot more egregious, but still more blatant.
And that ball was very catchable had the WR not been held.  To me it looked like it would have been thrown in a perfect spot where only the wideout could have caught it.
However, I did enjoy Harbaugh's meltdown.  Grow up Jimmy.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/5/2013 1:36 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



dkeener67 wrote:
Jamiemurt wrote: You guys gotta admit that the hold last night was a lot more egregious than the so called hold in the Natty in 2002...
I have to agree with this.  They were both holds, but the SF hold was worse- not a lot more egregious, but still more blatant.
And that ball was very catchable had the WR not been held.  To me it looked like it would have been thrown in a perfect spot where only the wideout could have caught it.
However, I did enjoy Harbaugh's meltdown.  Grow up Jimmy.
  officiating was pretty bad..   They called pass interference on SF  on Baltimore's previous drive where they made a field goal to go up 34-29.   this holding was much worse.. 
anyway,  Harbaugh and niners can only blame themselves... they couldnt get  5 yards in 4 tries ,despite so many offensive weapons?   playcalling lost the game for them.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/5/2013 1:39 PM

Re: Terry Porter 



dkeener67 wrote:
Jamiemurt wrote: You guys gotta admit that the hold last night was a lot more egregious than the so called hold in the Natty in 2002...
I have to agree with this.  They were both holds, but the SF hold was worse- not a lot more egregious, but still more blatant.
And that ball was very catchable had the WR not been held.  To me it looked like it would have been thrown in a perfect spot where only the wideout could have caught it.
However, I did enjoy Harbaugh's meltdown.  Grow up Jimmy.
both pale compared to what happened to Gamble on the no-call with 2 minutes left in the national title game
Reply | Quote

Posted: 2/5/2013 9:01 PM

Re: Terry Porter 


Terry Porter was in our office today here in Stillwater, Oklahoma.  My co-worker officiates high school and collegiate sports in Oklahoma and Terry stopped by to chat with him.  Most Okies agree he made the right call--had he thrown the flag a second or two quicker there would not have been such controversy.
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
< Prev.  Page of 2