|
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 5:49 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
The NCAA is a paper tiger, why $$$. The last two teams to get bashed were usc and bama. When they let the barn skate with newton, after his own father admitted to the NCAA that he shopped him and they found the infamous loophole of "we can't prove that the kid knew about it", you knew they had no desire to police. They won't interfere with any money making entities anymore. So it might as well be the wild wild west again. --------------------------------------------- --- SETIBuckeye wrote: RipAndRattle wrote: Why the hell am I the only one that remembers that Oregon is going to get NCAA penalties?
No way is a new coach is going to 13-0 and with incoming penalties you keep playing that tune... but what penalties...are you talking about...? there is no reference anywhere that Oregon is going to get hit for paying 25K for lousy recruiting videos... no pay to go there, no pay to play there, to pay to bring your friends there... nothing...? you are hoping Oregon gets bombed, but Nike is huge with the NCAA, and Uncle Phil is not going to sit back and let the NCAA roll over Oregon for 25K in recruiting films. If you know something about Oregon buying players then show us, if not, then stop with the "Oregon is going to get it worse than tOSU and USC"... it just isn't shaping out like that. Now if you want to talk about "the U" eventually getting bombed, then you have something, but the Oregon story has been the same, 25k in recruiting services, and the School has been working with the NCAA, so no new allegations throughout the investigations, so why would Oregon get bombed...? Educate us RR, please drop some of the knowledge on us... --------------------------------------------- |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 9:57 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Though its been proven with authority that the 12-0 teams are often not better than the 1 loss SEC team, the undefeateds would go without a doubt.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 10:31 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
macdadbama wrote: What you fine gentlemen have failed to consider is the annual semi-final play in game to the bcsncg, also known as the sec championship game. If bama were to make it to and win that game against an in all likelihood top 5 team from the sec east (UGa, fla, sc), it will get the usual late season bounce in bcs rankings. Could make it very interesting at that point. However, with 1 loss and rampant sec fatigue undefeated probably still gets in. Good point. It would probably be Bama that gets in against OSU. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 11:00 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
why is everyone confident that oregon will make it undefeated?  They'll have a new coach and theres at least a couple games that could give them some trouble (at stanford, at Washington, UCLA) You're a simple coward! A simple coward! And when you pee, that yellow that comes out, I bet you smile at that because it's yellow, your favorite color!"
- Gary Busey on TTUN fans.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:14 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Lmao are you ****** serious DID EVERYONE JUST SKIP THIS OVER OR SOMETHING?!?!?!? http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/876 4076/oregon-ducks-ncaa-hearing-scout-willie-lyles- according-source SETIBuckeye wrote:
RipAndRattle wrote: Why the hell am I the only one that remembers that Oregon is going to get NCAA penalties?
No way is a new coach is going to 13-0 and with incoming penalties you keep playing that tune... but what penalties...are you talking about...?
there is no reference anywhere that Oregon is going to get hit for paying 25K for lousy recruiting videos... no pay to go there, no pay to play there, to pay to bring your friends there... nothing...?
you are hoping Oregon gets bombed, but Nike is huge with the NCAA, and Uncle Phil is not going to sit back and let the NCAA roll over Oregon for 25K in recruiting films.
If you know something about Oregon buying players then show us, if not, then stop with the "Oregon is going to get it worse than tOSU and USC"... it just isn't shaping out like that.
Now if you want to talk about "the U" eventually getting bombed, then you have something, but the Oregon story has been the same, 25k in recruiting services, and the School has been working with the NCAA, so no new allegations throughout the investigations, so why would Oregon get bombed...?
Educate us RR, please drop some of the knowledge on us...  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:30 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:34 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass. Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things. Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated. 16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 1:05 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Is Ohio State is 25-0, Braxton Miller will be the Heisman Trophy winner and Urban Meyer will be on the cover of Sports Illustrated. No way in hell Ohio State is left out.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 1:11 AM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Without having USC on their schedule the next two years (or ASU0, the Oregon @ Stanford matchup will be the game of the year in the Pac-12, and if either of those teams goes 13-0, I don't see either of them missing the NCG.
They'll both be in the pre-season top 5 next year, and Stanford has Oregon, USC, Cal & ND lined up for November, and only the USC game is a road game.
Florida, Georgia & LSU all face major rebuilding jobs on defense net season, which leaves Alabama & Texas A&M in the drivers seat for the SEC title.
If the Buckeyes can rebuild their DL, they'll definitely be in the hunt as well.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 10:45 AM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Jetmanlee wrote:
buckeye4573 wrote:well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen bama has one loss we will be out of it, if their is two undeafted teams. Why going to a to a playoff is huge for the SEC, just huge... Ha ha ha ha. The South! Dat, dere is football and we gonna; ROLL TIDE? |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 11:19 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
No one outside of Bama is going to run the table this year.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 11:21 AM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
 87falcon44 wrote: How did the Canes do this year? Are they still drawing dozens in to that stadium?
---------------------------------------------
--- 16isles wrote:
Who gets in?
Oregon at 13-0
www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php
Ohio St. at 13-0
www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php
Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M
www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php
It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it?
--------------------------------------------- |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 11:29 AM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
If some Pac Ten school is 12-0 and OSU is 13-0, I think no one loss team from anywhere gets in ahead of them barring some strange situation.
Recall this past year that KSU and Oregon were apparently headed to the BCS NC game until fairly late and Alabama was clearly going to miss it.
I have no idea of course if anyone goes undefeated, but in past years, we usually see 1 or 2 undefeated BCS teams at the end of the day. On occasion, there are none.
"Perfection is the enemy of good enough."
Fleet Marshal Gorshkov |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 11:47 AM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
WalkerNCH wrote: No one outside of Bama is going to run the table this year. You have got to be kidding. Ohio State is never going to lose again!  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:04 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
They may not though, at A&M? Not going to be easy. It is interesting, it is the last year it will be an issue. A playoff committee will fix all of this. OSU's AD is smart enough to see that coming. WalkerNCH wrote: No one outside of Bama is going to run the table this year. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:13 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
You think being 12-0 and ranked #3 is a sign people were fooled? So, what would change next year then? Oh, the OSU fanbase will save you? You really think that? The OSU fanbase will step and stop Alabama vs. Oregon? The fact that you may not have a top 20 team or win on schedule won't be a factor? RipAndRattle wrote: Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass.
Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things.
Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated.
16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:25 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
16isles wrote: You think being 12-0 and ranked #3 is a sign people were fooled? So, what would change next year then? Oh, the OSU fanbase will save you? You really think that? The OSU fanbase will step and stop Alabama vs. Oregon? The fact that you may not have a top 20 team or win on schedule won't be a factor?
RipAndRattle wrote: Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass.
Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things.
Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated.
16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes. I agree, a 12-0 duck or osu team will play over a one loss sec team without a doubt in my mind, which is fine. We all know the rules of this game and how they are played. Four team playoff is coming and this will not matter, thank god. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:30 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Are you shitting me. You dont know how the media works do you. The constant push to get Boise in the NC game despite playing in an awful conference (they got to BCS #2 before) and media loverboy was enough. OSU under Urban will be the same. Except Ohio State will start off preseason #3 most likely. Tamu and Bama will most likely be 1 and 2 and will take each other out. Depending on how the season goes we'll see what happens with the SEC, but the winner should be in the NC. An undefeated OSU will definitely be there, noway does the media allow a 25-0 Urban Meyer coached team out of the NC. 16isles wrote: You think being 12-0 and ranked #3 is a sign people were fooled? So, what would change next year then? Oh, the OSU fanbase will save you? You really think that? The OSU fanbase will step and stop Alabama vs. Oregon? The fact that you may not have a top 20 team or win on schedule won't be a factor?
RipAndRattle wrote: Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass.
Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things.
Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated.
16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:46 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
You act like there are 4 spots or something. 25-0 isn't going to make a difference, if you are putting the SEC champ in there, "automatically". 13-0 Oregon, Stanford.... Stanford gets ND and Oregon at home and you think 25-0 will trump that, you don't know how the media works, that is just how you want it to work. OSU better start buying Michigan, Nebraska and NW jerseys right now, because you are going to need them. YOUR OWN AD has sent the message loud and clear with the scheduling in the future. Even he knows and that is trying to finish top 4, never mind top 2. RipAndRattle wrote: Are you shitting me. You dont know how the media works do you. The constant push to get Boise in the NC game despite playing in an awful conference (they got to BCS #2 before) and media loverboy was enough. OSU under Urban will be the same.
Except Ohio State will start off preseason #3 most likely. Tamu and Bama will most likely be 1 and 2 and will take each other out. Depending on how the season goes we'll see what happens with the SEC, but the winner should be in the NC. An undefeated OSU will definitely be there, noway does the media allow a 25-0 Urban Meyer coached team out of the NC.
16isles wrote: You think being 12-0 and ranked #3 is a sign people were fooled? So, what would change next year then? Oh, the OSU fanbase will save you? You really think that? The OSU fanbase will step and stop Alabama vs. Oregon? The fact that you may not have a top 20 team or win on schedule won't be a factor?
RipAndRattle wrote: Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass.
Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things.
Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated.
16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes.
Last edited 1/26/2013 12:47 PM by 16isles
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2013 12:49 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Being that we were 2 in the BCS, what would need to change. How'd the canes do this year? Are they sucking balls as usual? --------------------------------------------- --- 16isles wrote: You think being 12-0 and ranked #3 is a sign people were fooled? So, what would change next year then? Oh, the OSU fanbase will save you? You really think that? The OSU fanbase will step and stop Alabama vs. Oregon? The fact that you may not have a top 20 team or win on schedule won't be a factor? RipAndRattle wrote: Im pretty sure alot of people bought 12-0 this year considering OSU finished AP #3 and is a preseason top 3-4 team for 2013, dumbass.
Not like that matters, we saw how last season went. ND got in without looking dominant, and Urban Meyer is a media king. Plus OSU the fanbase and national attention is much higher than a stanford or Oregon. The humans will put in a 25-0 OSU team over any other 1 loss team. Your not looking at the money side of things.
Besides, Stanford, etc are not going undefeated.
16isles wrote: Fine, so maybe it isn't Oregon. Maybe, it is Stanford. So, OSU is going to get in over 2-time defending champ Alabama and 13-0 Stanford because they beat 8-4 Michigan and 9-4 Nebraska in the title game? Do you really believe that?
Nobody bought 12-0 this year, why would they next year? Even more cupcakes. --------------------------------------------- What do you think about the Ohio State hire?
"Not...not good"-$cum's coach
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
