|
2013- 1 vs. 2
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:05 PM
2013- 1 vs. 2
Who gets in?
Oregon at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php
Ohio St. at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php
Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php
It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:10 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
16isles wrote: Who gets in?
Oregon at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php
Ohio St. at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php
Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php
It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it? Well considering fen' Texas A&M will have three losses "Bama" will be staying fen' home Besides A&M, Bama's schedules is no more tougher than ours. Actually it's fen' weaker!!! They play a Div.1 AA pussy and a fen' team from Georgia that just started playing football. Big deal; they don't need to oversign with that schedule  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:11 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Why would we need to cheer for Michigan ThorntonMellon? Still butthurt about the 02 Tittle game?
Thank you seniors for your hard work and dedication. Champions in our minds, and champions in our hearts.
12-0
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:16 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
August 31 2013 Virginia Tech * in Atlanta, Georgia
September 7 2013 Open Date
September 14 2013 at Texas A&M
September 21 2013 Open Date
September 28 2013 Ole Miss
October 5 2013 Georgia State
October 12 2013 at Kentucky
October 19 2013 Arkansas
October 26 2013 Tennessee
November 2 2013 Open Date
November 9 2013 LSU
November 16 2013 at Mississippi State
November 23 2013 Chattanooga
November 30 2013 at Auburn
Based on this schedule and the only away game with any teeth to it, alabama has an extra week to prepare......I'd say it's a lock we'll be watching an OSU/Oregon Title Game
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:21 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
I bet the team with a 25 game winning streak gets in.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:24 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
VaTech could be back. Bama fans could be "pulling" for them all season, which is amusing.
Hard to see Auburn and Arkansas being much of a threat, and LSU has lost a zillion players and has no real offense. Let's assume they lose a close game to A&M who finished 10-2.
Then they would face some decently ranked team in the CG.
Alabama would need some help if they are 12-1 and two major programs are 13-0.
"Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.”
—Benjamin Franklin, 1706–1790 |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:34 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Dont think so!!!! Oh yeah, I do root for scUM all year. TO LOSE EVERY GAME THEY PLAY!!! |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 3:43 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
if any school needs to be worried its probably Oregon. they are a small market with a niche fanbase. The big dogs move the needle and oregon is not a big dog. no matter how shiny their uniforms are
"To suspect your own mortality is to know the beginning of terror; to learn irrefutably that you are mortal is to know the end of terror." |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:22 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
This....
---------------------------------------------
--- hidownthai95 wrote:
if any school needs to be worried its probably Oregon. they are a small market with a niche fanbase. The big dogs move the needle and oregon is not a big dog. no matter how shiny their uniforms are
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
7 National Championships
7 Heisman Winners
35 Big Ten Championships
A Tradition of Excellence!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:25 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
16isles wrote: Who gets in?
Oregon at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php
Ohio St. at 13-0
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php
Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php
It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it? Want to see scum get their ass beat every game OSU doesn't need scum to be good (look at the RR years) |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:30 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:35 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
buckeye4573 wrote:well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen All three undeafted bama vs the ducks, tOSU will get left out in the cold just like auburn in 04, they play no OOC game and play in a weak conf. Plus, everybody wants too see bama vs the ducks, why I don't know, bama will kill them and and the buckeyes. Bama is built on the Oline and Dlines and will be loaded again next year... |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:36 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
How did the Canes do this year? Are they still drawing dozens in to that stadium? --------------------------------------------- --- 16isles wrote: Who gets in? Oregon at 13-0 www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php Ohio St. at 13-0 www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it? --------------------------------------------- What do you think about the Ohio State hire?
"Not...not good"-$cum's coach
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:43 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Jetmanlee wrote:
buckeye4573 wrote:well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen All three undeafted bama vs the ducks, tOSU will get left out in the cold just like auburn in 04, they play no OOC game and play in a weak conf. Plus, everybody wants too see bama vs the ducks, why I don't know, bama will kill them and and the buckeyes. Bama is built on the Oline and Dlines and will be loaded again next year... Everybody but advertisers and those selling them time. "musha ring dumma doo dumma da"
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:43 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
buckeye4573 wrote:well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen bama has one loss we will be out of it, if their is two undeafted teams. Why going to a to a playoff is huge for the SEC, just huge... |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 4:54 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
Why the hell am I the only one that remembers that Oregon is going to get NCAA penalties?
No way is a new coach is going to 13-0 and with incoming penalties
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 5:00 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
GoldenPlaypen wrote:
Jetmanlee wrote:
buckeye4573 wrote:well both would be in over Bama.....now if Bama is undefeated...then prob OSU and Bama....sorry but royalty programs get the nod......sucks to be a latecomer to the big boys table....but no 1 loss team gets in over an undefeated BCS team.....not going to happen All three undeafted bama vs the ducks, tOSU will get left out in the cold just like auburn in 04, they play no OOC game and play in a weak conf. Plus, everybody wants too see bama vs the ducks, why I don't know, bama will kill them and and the buckeyes. Bama is built on the Oline and Dlines and will be loaded again next year... Everybody but advertisers and those selling them time. Maybe, maybe not, they want a good game, not a blow out, they don't care who plays, IMO. If it is a close game everybody will watch, just the way it is. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 5:25 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
--------------------------------------------- --- 16isles wrote: Who gets in? Oregon at 13-0 www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-ore gon-ducks-football-schedule.php Ohio St. at 13-0 www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/big-ten/2013-oh io-state-buckeyes-football-schedule.php Alabama 12-1 with loss at Texas A & M www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/sec/2013-alabam a-crimson-tide-football-schedule.php It looks like OSU is going to need to cheer for Michigan ALL year long, doesn't it? --------------------------------------------- Good question. Hard to say which one of those teams would play OSU...... |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 5:39 PM
Re: 2013- 1 vs. 2
What you fine gentlemen have failed to consider is the annual semi-final play in game to the bcsncg, also known as the sec championship game. If bama were to make it to and win that game against an in all likelihood top 5 team from the sec east (UGa, fla, sc), it will get the usual late season bounce in bcs rankings. Could make it very interesting at that point. However, with 1 loss and rampant sec fatigue undefeated probably still gets in.
Last edited 1/25/2013 5:42 PM by macdadbama
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2013 5:42 PM
RE: 2013- 1 vs. 2
RipAndRattle wrote: Why the hell am I the only one that remembers that Oregon is going to get NCAA penalties?
No way is a new coach is going to 13-0 and with incoming penalties you keep playing that tune... but what penalties...are you talking about...? there is no reference anywhere that Oregon is going to get hit for paying 25K for lousy recruiting videos... no pay to go there, no pay to play there, to pay to bring your friends there... nothing...? you are hoping Oregon gets bombed, but Nike is huge with the NCAA, and Uncle Phil is not going to sit back and let the NCAA roll over Oregon for 25K in recruiting films. If you know something about Oregon buying players then show us, if not, then stop with the "Oregon is going to get it worse than tOSU and USC"... it just isn't shaping out like that. Now if you want to talk about "the U" eventually getting bombed, then you have something, but the Oregon story has been the same, 25k in recruiting services, and the School has been working with the NCAA, so no new allegations throughout the investigations, so why would Oregon get bombed...? Educate us RR, please drop some of the knowledge on us... NIXUS (effort), AGNITIO (knowledge), CIVITAS(citizenship) |
|
Reply |
Quote |
