superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: Michigan doesn't have anybody down low. What win by Michigan has impressed you? I forgot.... Kansas.

The beat NC St and won at Minnesota.

Doesn't have anybody down low? That statement demonstrates that you likely know very little about Michigan outside of a box score.

16isles wrote: NC St. lost to MARYLAND and WAKE on the road, got blown out by Oklahoma St. This is what impresses you about Michigan? lol Their leading point scorer at the 4 or 5 position is 6.4 points a game. That is the definition of not having anyone down low. Jordan Morgan? lol Oh wait, he does grab 5 rebounds. hahaha  Minnesota? Last four games? 0-4

 

The fen’ love will never stop.

Right now Ole Miss who got a 5 star WR made headlines as if their going for a number 1 recruiting class, probably the best players that fen’ crappy school got since Eli manning back in 1999 or 2000.

superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: Michigan doesn't have anybody down low. What win by Michigan has impressed you? I forgot.... Kansas.

The beat NC St and won at Minnesota.

Doesn't have anybody down low? That statement demonstrates that you likely know very little about Michigan outside of a box score.

superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: NC St. lost to MARYLAND and WAKE on the road, got blown out by Oklahoma St. This is what impresses you about Michigan? lol Their leading point scorer at the 4 or 5 position is 6.4 points a game. That is the definition of not having anyone down low. Jordan Morgan? lol Oh wait, he does grab 5 rebounds. hahaha  Minnesota? Last four games? 0-4

 

They have a combination of Jordan Morgan, Mitch McGary and Jon Horford down low. None of those guys alone are dominant at this point, but most agreed McGary was one of the top incoming big men in the country. Michigan's strength is the better than average talent at every position, including possibly the best point guard in the country.

Just an FYI, it's not just me that's sold on Michigan.. Apparently there's 1 or 2 other folks that feel the same way, otherwise they wouldn't be the #1 team in the country. Just a minor detail.

16isles wrote: They won at home against an 8 seed and beat an 11 on the road. Still like Michigan, pal? lololol Who did I say was tough again? Oh yeah, Duke, Louisville, Syracuse, Florida and Kansas. I guess I just "know very little about Michigan outside of a box score."

superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: Michigan doesn't have anybody down low. What win by Michigan has impressed you? I forgot.... Kansas.

The beat NC St and won at Minnesota.

Doesn't have anybody down low? That statement demonstrates that you likely know very little about Michigan outside of a box score.

ktffan wrote:

16isles wrote: They won at home against an 8 seed and beat an 11 on the road. Still like Michigan, pal? lololol Who did I say was tough again? Oh yeah, Duke, Louisville, Syracuse, Florida and Kansas. I guess I just "know very little about Michigan outside of a box score."

superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: Michigan doesn't have anybody down low. What win by Michigan has impressed you? I forgot.... Kansas.

The beat NC St and won at Minnesota.

Doesn't have anybody down low? That statement demonstrates that you likely know very little about Michigan outside of a box score.

Yeah, that Kansas is really tougher than Michigan.

So, now we see you are as ignorant of basketball as you are of football.  The amazing thing is you still bother to make a fool of yourself.

scarlet71 wrote: WHO CARES ABOUT THE $EC.......DON'T KNOW WHY THEY TROLL THIS BOARD?  WE ALL KNOW THE REASON

34011 wrote: Wow, lets see bama women won the gym title, womens golf title, and womens softball title, the men came in second to win the golf title and we won the bcs title two years in a row. Bama is a one trick pony, alright, we did all that in 2012, dude.. Sure I'm glad bama is just a one trick pony.... I think you posters are one trick pony's...

buckeyemark wrote: If Ohio State sold out to football like SEC has it would cut about half of it's varsity sports and put the money into coaches and recruiting.

Ohio State isn't a ONE TRICK PONY like Alabama!

Ohio State has been good at football, men's basketball, and women's basketball for the better part of the last 20 years. It is also good at times at baseball, soccer, hockey, volleyball, etc...

Ohio State is even good at sports like Synchronized Swimming! Most Alabama fans can't even spell synchronized swimming!

Football is King at Ohio State. However, Ohio State wants to be good at everything else as well.

34011 wrote: tOSU has not sold out to football come on man...

buckeyemark wrote: Ohio State has like 35!

Harder to spend money on football when you take title IX and providing opportunities for athletes beyond football.

The SEC has essentially sold out for football.

dirtysouthbucks wrote: how many varsity athletes do SEC athletic departments support, compared to Big Ten ADs?

GoGetCower wrote:

Sorry but football is the only sport that matters. Save the swimming and dance teams for the queers.

Then again I heard you B10 folks go for that kind of stuff. Especially with kids.

GoGetCower wrote:

buckeyemark wrote: If Ohio State sold out to football like SEC has it would cut about half of it's varsity sports and put the money into coaches and recruiting.

Ohio State isn't a ONE TRICK PONY like Alabama!

Ohio State has been good at football, men's basketball, and women's basketball for the better part of the last 20 years. It is also good at times at baseball, soccer, hockey, volleyball, etc...

Ohio State is even good at sports like Synchronized Swimming! Most Alabama fans can't even spell synchronized swimming!

Football is King at Ohio State. However, Ohio State wants to be good at everything else as well.

34011 wrote: tOSU has not sold out to football come on man...

buckeyemark wrote: Ohio State has like 35!

Harder to spend money on football when you take title IX and providing opportunities for athletes beyond football.

The SEC has essentially sold out for football.

dirtysouthbucks wrote:

how many varsity athletes do SEC athletic departments support, compared to Big Ten ADs?

Sorry but football is the only sport that matters. Save the swimming and dance teams for the queers.

Then again I heard you B10 folks go for that kind of stuff. Especially with kids.

16isles wrote: They won at home against an 8 seed and beat an 11 on the road. Still like Michigan, pal? lololol Who did I say was tough again? Oh yeah, Duke, Louisville, Syracuse, Florida and Kansas. I guess I just "know very little about Michigan outside of a box score."

superman2424 wrote:

16isles wrote: Michigan doesn't have anybody down low. What win by Michigan has impressed you? I forgot.... Kansas.

The beat NC St and won at Minnesota.

Doesn't have anybody down low? That statement demonstrates that you likely know very little about Michigan outside of a box score.

You don't just now very little about Michigan outside of a box score, you flat out know very little.

Michigan has now beaten three of your "tough" team.  Again you display that you know jack.  You don't know football, you don't know basketball.

funat5pm wrote:

GoGetCower wrote:

buckeyemark wrote: If Ohio State sold out to football like SEC has it would cut about half of it's varsity sports and put the money into coaches and recruiting.

Ohio State isn't a ONE TRICK PONY like Alabama!

Ohio State has been good at football, men's basketball, and women's basketball for the better part of the last 20 years. It is also good at times at baseball, soccer, hockey, volleyball, etc...

Ohio State is even good at sports like Synchronized Swimming! Most Alabama fans can't even spell synchronized swimming!

Football is King at Ohio State. However, Ohio State wants to be good at everything else as well.

34011 wrote: tOSU has not sold out to football come on man...

buckeyemark wrote: Ohio State has like 35!

Harder to spend money on football when you take title IX and providing opportunities for athletes beyond football.

The SEC has essentially sold out for football.

dirtysouthbucks wrote:

how many varsity athletes do SEC athletic departments support, compared to Big Ten ADs?

Sorry but football is the only sport that matters. Save the swimming and dance teams for the queers.

Then again I heard you B10 folks go for that kind of stuff. Especially with kids.

Ohhh that's rich coming from a fan base that enjoys dropping their sack on another guy's face. What's worse is the indifference and humor your fan base saw in it.

rivergator wrote:

funat5pm wrote:

GoGetCower wrote:

buckeyemark wrote: If Ohio State sold out to football like SEC has it would cut about half of it's varsity sports and put the money into coaches and recruiting.

Ohio State isn't a ONE TRICK PONY like Alabama!

Ohio State has been good at football, men's basketball, and women's basketball for the better part of the last 20 years. It is also good at times at baseball, soccer, hockey, volleyball, etc...

Ohio State is even good at sports like Synchronized Swimming! Most Alabama fans can't even spell synchronized swimming!

Football is King at Ohio State. However, Ohio State wants to be good at everything else as well.

34011 wrote: tOSU has not sold out to football come on man...

buckeyemark wrote: Ohio State has like 35!

Harder to spend money on football when you take title IX and providing opportunities for athletes beyond football.

The SEC has essentially sold out for football.

dirtysouthbucks wrote:

how many varsity athletes do SEC athletic departments support, compared to Big Ten ADs?

Sorry but football is the only sport that matters. Save the swimming and dance teams for the queers.

Then again I heard you B10 folks go for that kind of stuff. Especially with kids.

Ohhh that's rich coming from a fan base that enjoys dropping their sack on another guy's face. What's worse is the indifference and humor your fan base saw in it.

I always find that argument bizarre. One fan did it. That means that's what all fans are? Can we assume all OSU fans have the moral guidance of Maurice Clarett, the self-control of Art Schlichter?
Of course not.

$EC