Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >

Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than Braxton

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:46 PM

Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than Braxton 


It really upsets me that Braxton didnt get his chance to shine this bowl season. 

I watched Bridgewater play well against a dead Florida team. I saw Mariotta play average vs. an above average Kansas State team. 

Johnny Football was great tonight!! But did you see how he was barely touched out there? He could sit in the pocket all day! Those long runs would have been touchdowns if it were Braxton! 

He has two high 1st round LT's and more experienced WR group than Braxton.

As a talent Braxton is superior than those guys.

Last edited 1/4/2013 11:52 PM by ecnirp

Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:48 PM

Re: Johnny Football, Bridgewater, Mariotta ARENT BETTER than 


heck no they're not! Braxton has a stronger arm and a better runner than all of them
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:51 PM

Re: Johnny Football, Bridgewater, Mariotta ARENT BETTER than 


Exactly!!! They all have better playmakers around them too. Until Hyde emerged late....it was Braxton or bust. 
Maker84 wrote: heck no they're not! Braxton has a stronger arm and a better runner than all of them
Reply | Quote
  • BobLobla
  • All-American
  • 2524 posts this site
Avatar

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:55 PM

Re: Johnny Football, Bridgewater, Mariotta ARENT BETTER than 


Athletic measurables should gauge well in Braxton's favor. But the other 3 have great intangibles and decision making. Something for Braxton to strive for in his development and becoming an all-around QB, but he isn't there yet IMO.

"You're either getting better or worse. You're never the same."  - Woody Hayes
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:55 PM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


I think all the QBs you mentioned are currently more polished than Miller, and Manziel is a better overall player and Bridgewater is currently one of the better passers in the nation, but Miller has the highest ceiling among QBs in the nation.

No shame in saying that Miller might not be as good as some of these guys. Hard to remember so many underclassmen QBs that are so great already.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/4/2013 11:57 PM

Re: Johnny Football, Bridgewater, Mariotta ARENT BETTER than 



BobLobla wrote: Athletic measurables should gauge well in Braxton's favor. But the other 3 have great intangibles and decision making. Something for Braxton to strive for in his development and becoming an all-around QB, but he isn't there yet IMO.

Miller was thinking too much toward the end of the season in my opinion. Especially with his running. He was dancing instead of making the quick cuts that he was making early in the year. The potential to be great all the time is there for sure.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:07 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


Sorry, manziel is better.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:09 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


I don't see how anyone could say otherwise at this point. I don't see a CFB player at the AB spot playing better this year.
macdadbama wrote: Sorry, manziel is better.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:29 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


One thing Braxton needs to learn how to do is scramble and buy time in the pocket more. He gets sacked too easily under pressure
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:32 AM

RE: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than Bra 


If you guys want to see something funny, head over to the Florida Recruiting boards. They brought back an old thread comparing Bridgewater, Miller, and Driskel from 2010. The Florida fans LOVED Driskel then and said that Miller was BY FAR the worst player of the three.

LINK

Last edited 1/5/2013 12:50 AM by footballstud01

Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:40 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


What game did you watch tonight? I agree TAMU's OL is awesome, but Manziel put some ankle breaking moves on the OU secondary.
ecnirp wrote: It really upsets me that Braxton didnt get his chance to shine this bowl season. 

I watched Bridgewater play well against a dead Florida team. I saw Mariotta play average vs. an above average Kansas State team. 

Johnny Football was great tonight!! But did you see how he was barely touched out there? He could sit in the pocket all day! Those long runs would have been touchdowns if it were Braxton! 

He has two high 1st round LT's and more experienced WR group than Braxton.

As a talent Braxton is superior than those guys.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:43 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 



OSU81 wrote: What game did you watch tonight? I agree TAMU's OL is awesome, but Manziel put some ankle breaking moves on the OU secondary.
ecnirp wrote: It really upsets me that Braxton didnt get his chance to shine this bowl season. 

I watched Bridgewater play well against a dead Florida team. I saw Mariotta play average vs. an above average Kansas State team. 

Johnny Football was great tonight!! But did you see how he was barely touched out there? He could sit in the pocket all day! Those long runs would have been touchdowns if it were Braxton! 

He has two high 1st round LT's and more experienced WR group than Braxton.

As a talent Braxton is superior than those guys.
He did...but that doesnt mean Braxton wouldnt have taken some of those carries for TDs. Guys were nowhere close to him out there.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:43 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


Well UF did tell Bridgewater they wanted him only at WR because Driscell was their guy.....WHIFF
"Blacks had to stand up to the same kind of intense scrutiny.Their freedom comes from being willing to suffer the same slings and arrows as UK and Calipari are dealing with right now"- BigBlueAllOverU
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 12:51 AM

RE: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than Bra 



footballstud01 wrote: If you guys want to see something funny, head over to the Florida Recruiting boards. They brought back an old thread comparing Bridgewater, Miller, and Driskel from 2010. The Florida fans LOVED Driskel then and said that Miller was BY FAR the worst player of the three.

LINK

I read some of those posts and literally spit my drink.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 1:11 AM

Re: Johnny Football, Bridgewater, Mariotta ARENT BETTER than 



buckeye9chuck wrote:
BobLobla wrote: Athletic measurables should gauge well in Braxton's favor. But the other 3 have great intangibles and decision making. Something for Braxton to strive for in his development and becoming an all-around QB, but he isn't there yet IMO.

Miller was thinking too much toward the end of the season in my opinion. Especially with his running. He was dancing instead of making the quick cuts that he was making early in the year. The potential to be great all the time is there for sure.
Agree. He just hit a wall towards the end of the year after being on pace for almost 1500 rushing yards. The play calling was also a bit mystifying against some teams as well. I think that next year he will show more decisiveness and awareness and that will help him to scramble and have better pocket presence.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 1:31 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


+1
1926Buckeyes wrote: I think all the QBs you mentioned are currently more polished than Miller, and Manziel is a better overall player and Bridgewater is currently one of the better passers in the nation, but Miller has the highest ceiling among QBs in the nation.

No shame in saying that Miller might not be as good as some of these guys. Hard to remember so many underclassmen QBs that are so great already.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 1:32 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


Blasphemy on Heinygate.
Reply | Quote
  • Taribor
  • All-American
  • 2891 posts this site

Posted: 1/5/2013 3:07 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


They're all good.  This "he's the best" crap is for third graders.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 1/5/2013 3:13 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 


The other 2 are MUCH better at throwing the ball. IMO ND's QB is a better passer than Miller.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 1/5/2013 3:23 AM

Re: Johnny Football/Bridgewater/Mariotta ARE NOT BETTER than 



If you really think that Braxton is a better player than Manziel right now, then you truly are a homer.
---------------------------------------------
--- ecnirp wrote:

It really upsets me that Braxton didnt get his chance to shine this bowl season. 

I watched Bridgewater play well against a dead Florida team. I saw Mariotta play average vs. an above average Kansas State team. 

Johnny Football was great tonight!! But did you see how he was barely touched out there? He could sit in the pocket all day! Those long runs would have been touchdowns if it were Braxton! 

He has two high 1st round LT's and more experienced WR group than Braxton.

As a talent Braxton is superior than those guys.

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 4  Next >