Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)

Re: I still say we only win 22 games

Posted: 02/22/2013 3:04 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games 


Lundardi has us a number 7 seed right now and that is counting the Cal loss. I think we hold serve with this seed. Remember we will be playing a bottom feeder to start the Pac12 tourney, so that is a win (or should be)
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/22/2013 3:58 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (6 votes)



We will play a bottom feeder if we stay in the top 4 of the league. Four teams are within a game of each other so anything can happen.
This team really needs to have a Come to Jesus meeting and realize the opportunity at hand. They gave away the Pac-12 championship last year. They don't want to do that again this year.

---------------------------------------------
--- rjfrik wrote:

Lundardi has us a number 7 seed right now and that is counting the Cal loss. I think we hold serve with this seed. Remember we will be playing a bottom feeder to start the Pac12 tourney, so that is a win (or should be)

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/23/2013 9:38 AM

RE: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (2 votes)




---------------------------------------------
--- AnnieDuck1 wrote:

Good points. But could we please not insult little girls. How about "little wimp?" :)

---------------------------------------------


Thanks for the reminder Annie!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 02/23/2013 10:28 AM

how come we rarely hear from Talos or Eksynyt after a win? Post Rating (4 votes)


NT

Last edited 02/23/2013 2:53 PM by superduckdc

Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/23/2013 6:44 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games 


LOL. So many idiots.

---------------------------------------------
--- Eksynyt wrote:

This team is gutless right now. Just sad. Hello NIT.

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/23/2013 6:56 PM

In Eksynyt defense!!! Post Rating (3 votes)


He's a moron not an idiot!

---------------------------------------------
--- ntxduck wrote:

LOL. So many idiots.

---------------------------------------------
--- Eksynyt wrote:

This team is gutless right now. Just sad. Hello NIT.

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/23/2013 7:19 PM

Re: In Eksynyt defense!!! 


Does this mean we are going to lose another 3 straight now?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/23/2013 7:25 PM

Re: In Eksynyt defense!!! Post Rating (1 vote)


I predicted a 2-2 record for these last four games. Our biggest challenge is avoiding a let down game after a big win. It's good we have a few days instead of a tight turnaround and it's home against the Beavs!

---------------------------------------------
--- Evolution00 wrote:

Does this mean we are going to lose another 3 straight now?

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/25/2013 10:19 AM

Re: In Eksynyt defense!!! 



---------------------------------------------
--- Evolution00 wrote:

Does this mean we are going to lose another 3 straight now?

---------------------------------------------

Yes. There is NO WAY that Oregon beats OSU or Utah (x2)...

Last edited 02/26/2013 10:55 AM by OregonDucks

Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/25/2013 11:49 AM

Re: In Eksynyt defense!!! 


If Oregon were to end up with only 22 wins, they would have to lose to OSU, Utah, Col, and then Utah again.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/25/2013 1:41 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games 


Maybe Wallawalla hacked his account?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/25/2013 1:46 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (4 votes)


Hey smart guy if you look at my prediction I predicted way more than 22. I had us beating Cal though.

---------------------------------------------
--- TahoeDuck20 wrote:

Maybe Wallawalla hacked his account?

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/25/2013 8:01 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (1 vote)


That's ONE of the factors talos4. Utah on the road isn't a tossup. Home court means little to players when they're in a quiet venue like the Utes stadium. Grow a pair. Stop sounding like Chicken Little.

You sit on pins and needles. Enjoy the seat by yourself. Oregon's in. Sorry you can't understand that like the normal people.

Wins ONE THE ROAD...remember how much you value that? Just said you did...on the road over AZ, UCLA, UNLV, and  ASU, all likely tourney teams by the way, and...22 wins..likely 24-25 when all's said and done. Puts them in.

Add one more...when they get to the conf. tourney...and it's 25 wins. Gee, sounds like NIT to me.  banghead
talos4 wrote: Since the tournament selection committee looks at your last 10+ games or so, we are still on thin ice with regards to making it in as an at-large without Artis.
As of right now, I see us being an 10/11 seed, but unless we get more needed wins to make it to 23 or more before the conference tourney starts, it will be pins and needles on Selection Sunday.
Somehow, we have to get past OSU at home (toss-up there), and get past Utah (another toss-up) on the road for the only 2 winnable games left on the schedule.
We need Artis back and at 100% before the P12 tourney. Anything less than that (a disastrous possible 1-3 finish and a first round out in the P12 tourney without him), spells NIT for us.

------------------------------------------------
wallawalladuck wrote:

I agree we should go 2-2 in the final four games but going into the game last night we were picked for a 6 seed. Losing 3 games (counting last night)...we would fall further than a 7th. We won't even be ranked either. We may get the dreaded 8 or 9 seed which is a death sentence. It would almost be better to get a 10th seed. Winner of 8-9 game plays number 1.

---------------------------------------------
--- rjfrik wrote:

You have no idea what you are talking about. Even if we only win one more game we still make the tournament. Sorry to burst your bubble buddy. I know you are wishing for us to go to the NIT but unless we lose every remaining game we play that will not happen. My guess is they go 2-2 the rest of the way and end up with a #7 seed. If Artis comes back all bets are off.

---------------------------------------------
--- Eksynyt wrote:

This team is gutless right now. Just sad. Hello NIT.

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

Tyree Robinson on Oregon v. UW - They kept trying to compare themselves to Oregon instead of showing me they were a program with a plan. Nothing compares to what Oregon has going on.

Last edited 02/25/2013 8:04 PM by realisticduck

Reply | Quote
  • HuskyFreeNW
  • Cas Center
  • Rating: 2.0/5 this site
  • 2557 posts this site

Posted: 02/26/2013 3:01 AM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (2 votes)


We will win out and get 1st seed in the tourney.

Bring on the rodents
Pac 12 Basketball Champions
Fiesta Bowl Champions
Rose Bowl Champions
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/26/2013 9:18 AM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games 


Just to clarify, we didn't beat ASU or AZ on the road.  We got both at MKA with no return trip to AZ.  Good wins thought that will certainly help our resume.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/26/2013 3:03 PM

Re: how come we rarely hear from Talos or Eksynyt after a win? Post Rating (1 vote)


Um, because I don't spend all my waking hours on this board like you do, apparently...



---------------------------------------------
--- superduckdc wrote:

NT

---------------------------------------------
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/26/2013 3:13 PM

Re: I still say we only win 22 games Post Rating (3 votes)


Wow, some of you little bitter people here are so touchy and feel so indignant at the smallest of things here, as usual.
The NCAA DOES look at your overall record, whom you've played, your last 10 games, RPI, and so on, and didn't discount the other factors as well, so calm down and take your medicine, please.

As I said a month ago after he was injured, without Artis we wouldn't play as well, and we haven't, as you may or may not have noticed.
I also said that we probably wouldn't have him back until the conference tourney, and that is looking to be the case.
I also thought that 23 wins would be the mark of getting us in other than winning the conference tournament, and I still stand by that.
Getting him back is important, as we do play much better with him in the lineup, and getting him back before the P12 tourney would be of great help toward cementing our tourney bid.
It's nice to see Loyd play well for a game or two, but having DA back at full strength is best.
At this point, anything's possible in a wide open in the two tournaments, with the mediocrity that really is the new norm for college basketball.

**just announced that it looks like DA is set to return for the CW on Thursday, so good news there.***




---------------------------------------------
--- realisticduck wrote:

That's ONE of the factors talos4. Utah on the road isn't a tossup. Home court means little to players when they're in a quiet venue like the Utes stadium. Grow a pair. Stop sounding like Chicken Little.

You sit on pins and needles. Enjoy the seat by yourself. Oregon's in. Sorry you can't understand that like the normal people.

Wins ONE THE ROAD...remember how much you value that? Just said you did...on the road over AZ, UCLA, UNLV, and  ASU, all likely tourney teams by the way, and...22 wins..likely 24-25 when all's said and done. Puts them in.

Add one more...when they get to the conf. tourney...and it's 25 wins. Gee, sounds like NIT to me.  <img src="media.scout.com/media/forums/e...ghead.gif" alt="banghead" border="0"/>
<blockquote dir="ltr"><strong>talos4 wrote:</strong> Since the tournament selection committee looks at your last 10+ games or so, we are still on thin ice with regards to making it in as an at-large without Artis.
As of right now, I see us being an 10/11 seed, but unless we get more needed wins to make it to 23 or more before the conference tourney starts, it will be pins and needles on Selection Sunday.
Somehow, we have to get past OSU at home (toss-up there), and get past Utah (another toss-up) on the road for the only 2 winnable games left on the schedule.
We need Artis back and at 100% before the P12 tourney. Anything less than that (a disastrous possible 1-3 finish and a first round out in the P12 tourney without him), spells NIT for us.

------------------------------------------------
wallawalladuck wrote:

I agree we should go 2-2 in the final four games but going into the game last night we were picked for a 6 seed. Losing 3 games (counting last night)...we would fall further than a 7th. We won't even be ranked either. We may get the dreaded 8 or 9 seed which is a death sentence. It would almost be better to get a 10th seed. Winner of 8-9 game plays number 1.

---------------------------------------------
--- rjfrik wrote:

You have no idea what you are talking about. Even if we only win one more game we still make the tournament. Sorry to burst your bubble buddy. I know you are wishing for us to go to the NIT but unless we lose every remaining game we play that will not happen. My guess is they go 2-2 the rest of the way and end up with a #7 seed. If Artis comes back all bets are off.

---------------------------------------------
--- Eksynyt wrote:

This team is gutless right now. Just sad. Hello NIT.

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------</ blockquote>

---------------------------------------------

Last edited 02/26/2013 3:16 PM by talos4

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 02/26/2013 3:17 PM

Re: how come we rarely hear from Talos or Eksynyt after a win? 



talos4 wrote: Um, because I don't spend all my waking hours on this board like you do, apparently...

Either do I, but I do find it interesting that you found the time  to post five times within 24 hours of the Cal loss, but only once within 24 hours of the Stanford win and it had nothing to do with the actual game.

Did you enjoy the Stanford game?  Still think we're going to have trouble reaching 23 wins?   What did you think of Jonathan Loyd's performance on Saturday?

You are doing better than your buddy Eksynyt who hasn't been heard from since the Stanford game.

Last edited 02/26/2013 3:21 PM by superduckdc

Reply | Quote
  • 73duck
  • Cas Center
  • Rating: 3.0/5 this site
  • 2241 posts this site

Posted: 02/26/2013 4:01 PM

Re: how come we rarely hear from Talos or Eksynyt after a win? 


> Eksynyt who hasn't been heard from since the Stanford game.

He'll be back in September the 1st Q of the Nicholls St game predicting a 6 win season if UO takes more than two minutes to score.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 02/27/2013 9:07 AM

Re: how come we rarely hear from Talos or Eksynyt after a win? Post Rating (1 vote)


Great to have Artis back even if he isn't at full strength. It will give Loyd more rest too. Loyd was awesome against Stanford though. Let's steamroll OSU! Honor the 4 seniors. Why are we doing it AFTER the game again instead of before?
Reply | Quote