|
We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
|
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:25 PM
We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (9 votes)
Altman and team need a lot of work on how to play at the end of games. This has happened far too often. It's a shame because otherwise they are exceeding expectations.
Thankfully, the Coogs choke by fouling near midcourt with 3 seconds left in OT with the game tied
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- mvrk22
- Tall Firs
- Rating: 3.2/5 this site
- 317 posts this site
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:30 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (3 votes)
dooq'd it?? What an idiotic comment.
There's only Coogs and Doogs.
---------------------------------------------
--- Go OR Ducks wrote:
Altman and team need a lot of work on how to play at the end of games. This has happened far too often. It's a shame because otherwise they are exceeding expectations.
Thankfully, the Coogs choke by fouling near midcourt with 3 seconds left in OT with the game tied
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:31 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (5 votes)
Nope....
Beavers are Boovs
Ducks are either Dooks or Dooqs
It's just how it is.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:31 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
Almost Quackedit??
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- mvrk22
- Tall Firs
- Rating: 3.2/5 this site
- 317 posts this site
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:33 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (5 votes)
You're an idiot. You and Beavermobile deserve each other.
Doogs are in a low class by themselves. They now dominate the fan base in Montlake.
---------------------------------------------
--- Go OR Ducks wrote:
Nope....
Beavers are Boovs
Ducks are either Dooks or Dooqs
It's just how it is.
---------------------------------------------
Last edited 02/16/2013 6:37 PM by mvrk22
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:44 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (6 votes)
Your a looser.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- section38
 - eDucker with no life
- Rating: 3.0/5 this site
- 11129 posts this site
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 6:59 PM
RE: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (4 votes)
Don't talk back to GoOrDo, he's so bloody rich he could buy your soul!
The symbol remains...  |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 8:42 PM
Don't mess with Sec38. They have the best s@%t of any section. (2 votes)
NT
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 9:18 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
Call it what you want, they cost me a $50. I thought for sure we cover...I also have the Dawgs tonite,
Greetings from Vegas all!!
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 9:22 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
On a side note you should have heard the collective groans from the Maryland game. Our game wasn't on any of the screens but Maryland-Duke was on two of the big screens at Ceasers Palace!
(Now If i would have only taken Miami to take the ACC at the beginning of the season....who saw that coming)
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- zubduck
- Mac-Autzen
- Rating: 2.9/5 this site
- 30 posts this site
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 9:34 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (1 vote)
we really need Artis back as i am sure Woods will be suspended at least one game after stupid elbow shot.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 9:40 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (2 votes)
What was the spread. I thought we were favored by 3.
---------------------------------------------
--- SrConrado wrote:
Call it what you want, they cost me a $50. I thought for sure we cover...I also have the Dawgs tonite,
Greetings from Vegas all!!
---------------------------------------------
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 11:31 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
Does it matter? Still only won by 2. (FWIW, I think it was 4) wallawalladuck wrote:
What was the spread. I thought we were favored by 3.
---------------------------------------------
--- SrConrado wrote:
Call it what you want, they cost me a $50. I thought for sure we cover...I also have the Dawgs tonite,
Greetings from Vegas all!!
--------------------------------------------- |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/16/2013 11:32 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (2 votes)
Yeah it matters because if the spread was 2 then it's a push. --------------------------------------------- --- CouchDuck wrote: Does it matter? Still only won by 2. (FWIW, I think it was 4) <blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>wallawalladuck wrote:</strong> What was the spread. I thought we were favored by 3. --------------------------------------------- --- SrConrado wrote: Call it what you want, they cost me a $50. I thought for sure we cover...I also have the Dawgs tonite, Greetings from Vegas all!! ---------------------------------------------</ blockquote> --------------------------------------------- |
|
Reply |
Quote |
- DuckyVandal
- Cas Center
- Rating: 2.9/5 this site
- 4851 posts this site
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 5:13 AM
RE: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
What the h*ll was Woods thinking on that cheap shot? Stupid.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 5:34 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!  (3 votes)
I am TOTALLY not "wager savy" but if it had been a push why would it have cost him $50 when he thought they would cover ?? wallawalladuck wrote:
Yeah it matters because if the spread was 2 then it's a push.
---------------------------------------------
--- CouchDuck wrote:
Does it matter? Still only won by 2. (FWIW, I think it was 4)
<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>wallawalladuck wrote:</strong>
What was the spread. I thought we were favored by 3.
---------------------------------------------
--- SrConrado wrote:
Call it what you want, they cost me a $50. I thought for sure we cover...I also have the Dawgs tonite,
Greetings from Vegas all!!
---------------------------------------------</ blockquote>
---------------------------------------------
Last edited 02/17/2013 5:36 PM by SalKeizDuck
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 5:42 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (1 vote)
He thought the spread was 4 so he lost. I thought the spread was 2 so it was a push. Depends what the spread was when he made the bet.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 5:42 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
Spread was between 3 and 4 all afternoon; was a thinly bet game here so it bounced
Back and forth a little on little action.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 5:53 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!! (2 votes)
The original poster didn't say he thought the spread was anything....He just said he'd lost $50 and thought Oregon would cover. After you said you thought the spread was 3 it was Couch that came back and said HE thought it was 4, not the original poster you'd questioned. If the spread had been 2, as you thought, the original poster wouldn't have lost his $50 bet, would he ??? Or, do you lose if you don't win ? Again, I'm not a gambler. wallawalladuck wrote: He thought the spread was 4 so he lost. I thought the spread was 2 so it was a push. Depends what the spread was when he made the bet. |
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 6:17 PM
Re: We Dooq'd it but in the end, they Coog'd it worse!!!
2pt win pays nothing even of spread is 3 so not sure how a "push" is even in the conversation. It was a small bet, but I tried to parlay a doog beat down on OSU into the mix but we didn't finish so it is what it is
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
Duck Pond