|
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
|
|
|
Posted: 02/13/2013 5:36 PM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
--------------------------------------------- --- govduck wrote:
" But M4Dux has it on good authority. What does he do,change Phil Knights diapers?"
Does it ever get old that your moderator who is about as credible as chipocrit continues to be wrong about predictions when it comes to deadlines regarding hearing from the NCAA, recruits your going to steal, our basketball team being investigated, "sources" he claims to have that are better than ours that predict doom to our program, and blah, blah, blah! I've been on educk since 99 and I can think of maybe one or two times M4 has been wrong and that had to do with a recruit changing his mind last minute. Please don't ever try to imply that our moderators are anywhere close to the frauds you have on dawgpile.com, it's not even close.
---------------------------------------------
NOMINATED !!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/14/2013 11:42 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote... (2 votes)
Links for accusations? Link Oregone NCAA Investigations.I made this all up? Trying to associate me with Grinolds or Chipocrit is a diversion. What did I predict? I said I think I know more going on in the Husky program then others on here. Prove me wrong.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/14/2013 1:52 PM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
Okay ... time to set the record straight:
1. Name the recruits that Oregon gained form cheating 2. Among THOSE RECRUITS, name the recruits that had an offer from another Pac10/pac12 school that went to Oregon
You'll find the answers to these questions will help you understand the difference between what you call Oregon cheating to gain an advantage over oterh Pac12 schools in recruiting, versus negative recruiting among Pac12 schools.
One more note ... Oregon fixed their problems with recruiting in 2011. UW has apparently been using negative recruiting tactics right up to the 2013 LOI day. Can you see a difference there?
--------------------------------------------- --- GGG19 wrote:
Do the other PAC12 staffs appreciate the D*ck staff cheating to beat them for recruits? Which is worse? Just down right cheating? Or negative recruiting? Rationalize it anyway you want. Two of the UW staff are exD*cks. So tell them to stop. Don't really care if the two staffs are not chatty. Weird that the two HC's were though. And I think I know a few more of the Dawg staff and associates then you do, having worked with the program in the past and present.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/14/2013 2:06 PM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote... (1 vote)
LOL, tapdancing is not your talent. No straight answer to some simple questions. Again, just admit you are making things up and really don't have a clue.
--------------------------------------------- --- GGG19 wrote:
Links for accusations? Link Oregone NCAA Investigations.I made this all up? Trying to associate me with Grinolds or Chipocrit is a diversion. What did I predict? I said I think I know more going on in the Husky program then others on here. Prove me wrong.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/14/2013 2:29 PM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
You made a SPECIFIC allegation about Oregon cheating to gain recruits over other Pac12 schools. You can stand up and admit you are blowing smoke about Oregon winning a single recruit over a single Pac12 school by the mistakes that Oregon made in accepting verbal reports from recruiting services, or you can retract your assertion and go back to trying defend Sark and the boys in their TACTICS against other Pac12 schools TODAY.
--------------------------------------------- --- GGG19 wrote:
Lets see what the NCAA comes out with. If something I know isn't in there. Then I will gladly pass it on. As far as specifics. Why would I say anything.Until proven,they are just allegations. You guys can't even come to grips that you are under NCAA investigation.If you don't believe that. Why would you believe me? Do you think your coaching staff is out on a mission trip just trying to save young souls? They are just as bad as the rest of the staffs. When we were beating the snot out of you, and were sanctioned, all you said, and still do, is....you only won because you cheated. Now it might be coming back around to you. But M4Dux has it on good authority. What does he do,change Phil Knights diapers?
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/15/2013 11:03 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote... (2 votes)
Where did Lyle's entourage of players that he was peddling around have offers to,or access. If he had any contact with any PAC12 team. There's your answer.And more, maybe to come. Specifics can come at the end.Whenever that is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/15/2013 11:16 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote... (1 vote)
Obviously another husky low-life lawyer who refuses to ever answer a direct question with direct answers.
Just as expected. Move on now, you must have another ambulance to chase down Montlake Blvd.
--------------------------------------------- --- GGG19 wrote:
Where did Lyle's entourage of players that he was peddling around have offers to,or access. If he had any contact with any PAC12 team. There's your answer.And more, maybe to come. Specifics can come at the end.Whenever that is.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/15/2013 11:45 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote... (1 vote)
--- GGG19 wrote:
Why would I say anything.Until proven,they are just allegations.
Where did Lyle's entourage of players that he was peddling around have offers to,or access. If he had any contact with any PAC12 team. There's your answer.And more, maybe to come. Specifics can come at the end.Whenever that is.
---------------------------------------------
If you're going to answer a question with a question, at least have the decency to put a question mark (?) at the end of it. LOL
"Maybe" "Whenever"
Classic example of the "sad little epidemic up in Seattle" as someone described it earlier.
"Sanctions or none?" "Do the other PAC12 staffs appreciate the D*ck staff cheating to beat them for recruits?"
--------------------------------------------- --- duckblood wrote: You have a link for this accusation?
Thanks
---------------------------------------------
--- FirstDuck wrote:
Okay, bucko. It is time to put up, or shut up.
------------------------
Describe the specifics of the cheating you are claiming with names of upset coaches, and impacted players. -----------
--- CuriousDuck wrote:
One of your coaches deliberately cheated on the field and got caught. Which is worse, imagined "cheating to beat them for [phantom] recruits" or admitted, but unsuccessful, cheating during actual competition? -------------
--- BODABAG wrote: Name one instance where the ducks "cheated" to beat out another p12 team for a recruit.
---------------------------------------------
--- Green85 wrote:
Okay ... time to set the record straight:
1. Name the recruits that Oregon gained form cheating 2. Among THOSE RECRUITS, name the recruits that had an offer from another Pac10/pac12 school that went to Oregon
------
--- FirstDuck wrote:
LOL, tapdancing is not your talent. No straight answer to some simple questions. Again, just admit you are making things up and really don't have a clue.
---------------------------------------------
--- Green85 wrote:
You made a SPECIFIC allegation about Oregon cheating to gain recruits over other Pac12 schools. You can stand up and admit you are blowing smoke about Oregon winning a single recruit over a single Pac12 school by the mistakes that Oregon made in accepting verbal reports from recruiting services, or you can retract your assertion and go back to trying defend Sark and the boys in their TACTICS against other Pac12 schools TODAY.
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/15/2013 11:46 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
--- GGG19 wrote:
When we were beating the snot out of you, and were sanctioned, all you said, and still do, is....you only won because you cheated.
---------------------------------------------
That's not exactly accurate. A LOT of teams were thumping the Ducks when you beat them regularly. You were caught cheating and harshly punished for certain things at certain times, but I would not say cheating is the "only" or "all" the reason you dominated Oregon for a long period.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 02/17/2013 8:19 AM
RE: State of poodle football, in a quote...
GGG19 wrote: Where did Lyle's entourage of players that he was peddling around have offers to,or access. If he had any contact with any PAC12 team. There's your answer.And more, maybe to come. Specifics can come at the end.Whenever that is. So we have to fill in the blanks because you don't want to box yourself in with an answer that anyone can shoot holes in. Are you implying that it is Lache Seastrunk? WOW, that is quite the revelation!!! You must have some seriously informed insider access.
|
|