The only difference between the teams is depth. Our coaching is good enough to win a title. Chip would not have won with our roster last year. Until we improve our depth coaching will be insignificant. Improving our depth takes time and that is why Sark needs more time and anybody would give to him.

I am trying to show that the insults thrown at Sark are laughable, after taking over an 0-12 program, unlike Chip who took over a top program.
---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> If we switched coaches and UO had Sark and UW had Chip, how much would the teams records last year have changed? Also please explain your answer.

This will tell everybody a lot about you and your analyzation skills.</blockquote>
W T F is this sh*7?

"Guise if michkul Jordin was never bourn chi ago would never has won championships!!!! RACK ME!!!!!"

---------------------------------------------

I fell asleep during that doogzzzzz/ PURDUE Rose Bowl.

Most people consider it the snooozy-est doogfest Rose Bowl of all time.

dubsup1234 wrote: The only difference between the teams is depth. Our coaching is good enough to win a title. Chip would not have won with our roster last year. Until we improve our depth coaching will be insignificant. Improving our depth takes time and that is why Sark needs more time and anybody would give to him.

I am trying to show that the insults thrown at Sark are laughable, after taking over an 0-12 program, unlike Chip who took over a top program.

Jesus Christ 

Oregon has nothing to do with Washington. Oregon can be national champions or finish 12 in conf. You are who you are loser...

Las Vegas Bowl runners up, Apple cup runners up.

I'll add "fantasy land champions" to the things husky fans like to celebrate.

So far the list goes: The long ago past, the never arriving future and things that never happened world champions!!!!!

Seriously bro, the only reason you didn't win the national championship is because you don't have alabama's roster or coaching staff. Other than that theres no difference.

Means nothing. It shows how much you care about us, when you say you beat us like it means something. Thank you for acknowledging how much we matter to you. No self respecting UW fan cares about beating Oregon. I just want to win a Rose Bowl. That is why 2001 was successful. You are the type of fan where if you go 1-11 but beat UW you will be happy. UW fans have higher expectations. If we go 11-1 and win the Rose Bowl and we lose to UO we don't care and we consider our season successful.

You are inconsequential. You don't matter. You can continue to care about us and we will care about the fact that we won the Rose Bowl in 2001, while you can only say you beat us. UW has 7 Rose Bowls and 2 "Natties." Can UO say the same?

If all you care about is UW vs UO check the overall standings. 58-42. Just sayin.

---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> Hahaha. Is that why we won the Rose Bowl in 2001?</blockquote>You shared the conf championship with 2 other teams.

Oregon beat you that season and then went on to beat a higher ranked opponent in the Holiday Bowl than you did in the magic "ROSE BOWL!!!!!"

You're nothing bro. You're not famous anymore. Deal with it.

---------------------------------------------

dubsup1234 wrote: Means nothing. It shows how much you care about us, when you say you beat us like it means something. Thank you for acknowledging how much we matter to you. No self respecting UW fan cares about beating Oregon. I just want to win a Rose Bowl. That is why 2001 was successful. You are the type of fan where if you go 1-11 but beat UW you will be happy. UW fans have higher expectations. If we go 11-1 and win the Rose Bowl and we lose to UO we don't care and we consider our season successful.

You are inconsequential. You don't matter. You can continue to care about us and we will care about the fact that we won the Rose Bowl in 2001, while you can only say you beat us. UW has 7 Rose Bowls and 2 "Natties." Can UO say the same?

If all you care about is UW vs UO check the overall standings. 58-42. Just sayin.

How much we care about you? You're on educk you weapon.

"2 natties." ffs 

UW has won a Rose Bowl in every decade dating back to the 1960s. The best programs in the country never stay down forever. Tradition > Flash and Uniforms . UW's fall has nothing to do with Oregon. It is all about hiring the worst coach in college football history in Ty Losingham. We have Sark now and our program has slowly often better year to year.

The funny thing is you say UW is a much worse program, when UW lost 3 close games that with a better kicker UW would have been 10-3. UW beat Stanford (the best program in the PAC). Can Oregon say the same?

---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> Isn't the past 9 years the past? So I guess your living in the past just like UW fans. Hahahahahahaha.

So with your insults should I assume you are not mature enough to conduct a discussion? It's fine, I understand how you must feel with your hero Chip leaving and knowing you are headed to mediocrity.

Whose your daddy? Udubbbbbbbb... Hahahahahahaha</blockquote>
"WE USED TO BE GOOD!!!!!"

We know bro. You used to be way better than Oregon and are now much, much worse. That puts you in the distinguished company of about 110 other football programs.

---------------------------------------------

dubsup1234 wrote: You are the type of fan where if you go 1-11 but beat UW you will be happy. UW fans have higher expectations.

dubsup1234 wrote: we beat Stanford


http://shop.gohuskies.com/Wash...0504803_PD.html

dubsup1234 wrote: The funny thing is you say UW is a much worse program, when UW lost 3 close games that with a better kicker UW would have been 10-3. UW beat Stanford (the best program in the PAC). Can Oregon say the same?

I agree bro. If you had Alabama's roster and their coaching staff and were located in Alabama you'd be #1!!!!!!!!!!!

BOW DOWN!!!!

You went 7-6 numerous times under Bellotti and were pretty much mediocre. You better hope Helfrich is not the next Bellotti. If he is you will be mediocre again.

If Sark continues to go 7-6 we will replace him and you can check Jim Lambright waif you don't believe me. I'm not sure Oregon will do the same for Helfrich considering they were happy with Bellotti's mediocrity.

Oregon fans have never won a national championship so they don't expect as much as UW fans do. Chip is not the norm for Oregon, I would guess Helfrich would be. I can sense your fear of what Helfrich might bring. Mediocrity.

hahahahahahahaaha.

---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> knowing you'll return to mediocrity, </blockquote>
Please stop cutting and pasting posts from 2006.

Why is it you people always talk about the past and the never arriving future?

---------------------------------------------

Who said all UW fans are the same? Hahahahahahahaaha.

I am talking about you and how you are bragging about beating UW in UW's Rose Bowl season. Doesn't that sound pathetic to you?

It seems beating UW is more important to you than winning the Rose Bowl.
---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr"><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> You are the type of fan where if you go 1-11 but beat UW you will be happy. <strong>UW fans have higher expectations.</strong></blockquote>
<strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> we beat Stanford


shop.gohuskies.com/Wash...0504803_PD.html

---------------------------------------------

Who is the doogs ALPHA MALE?

Hey section38,

Do you not have the ability to think for yourself or are you the typical t-shirt Duck fan that couldn't even graduate high school?

Seems to me that your posts are all pictures. Not many posts longer than a line or two. Is that how much your vocabulary allows you to write?

Hahahahahahahaaha .

Hahahahahahahahaha. Is that all you have? Say hi to hamburgerhand.

ANSWER THE QUESTION TROLL,

WHO IS THE DOOGS DADDY?

dubsup1234 wrote: 
I am talking about you and how you are bragging about beating UW in UW's Rose Bowl season. Doesn't that sound pathetic to you?

You beat Stanford though.

And you would have beat some other teams if you had better players and coaches too!

Never forget that. You are good, very good in a multitude of alternate time and space projections.

We're only good in this one 

section38 wrote: Hahahahahahahahaha. Is that all you have? Say hi to hamburgerhand.

ANSWER THE QUESTION TROLL,

WHO IS THE DOOGS DADDY?

Is that Husky Stadium being torn down in the reflection?

Maybe it's collapsing like in real life?

dubsup1234 wrote: You went 7-6 numerous times under Bellotti

Mike Bellotti aka "mediocre mike" went 7-6 or worse 5 times in 14 seasons.

Next year Steve Sixkisian will try and tie his record in just 5 short seasons.

BELLOTTI OUT!!!! ...

oh... right. 


.

I'll see you next time I go to McDonalds. Make sure you hand back the receipt, cashier. Don't all Ducks work there?

Hahahahahahahaaha
---------------------------------------------
--- section38 wrote:

Hahahahahahahahaha. Is that all you have? Say hi to hamburgerhand.

ANSWER THE QUESTION TROLL,

WHO IS THE DOOGS DADDY?

<img src="loadpaper.com/large/Soccer_wal...s_218.png" width="1000" height="800"/>

---------------------------------------------

dubsup1234 wrote:
I'll see you next time I go to McDonalds. 

Eating at McDonalds, The sure sign of a "THE DUB!!!!!" graduate.

:epicacademicssmackbro:

Hahahahahahahaaha

If Sark goes 7-6 next year he will be out. That is the difference between UW and UO. UW doesn't accept perpetual mediocrity.

The crazy thing isn't that he went 7-5 that many times. It is the fact that you didn't even fire him and were happy with mediocrity. Doesn't bode we'll for Oregon if Helfrich takes the same path. You'll probably keep him for 20 years going 7-6 year after year. It's probably your worst nightmare.

---------------------------------------------
--- laxduck wrote:


<blockquote dir="ltr" ><strong>dubsup1234 wrote:</strong> You went 7-6 numerous times under Bellotti</blockquote>Mike Bellotti aka "mediocre mike" went 7-6 or worse 5 times in 14 seasons.

Next year Steve Sixkisian will try and tie his record in just 5 seasons.

BELLOTTI OUT!!!! <img src="media.scout.com/media/forums/e...s/mad.gif" alt="mad" border="0"/>...

oh... right.

---------------------------------------------