What's that number mean? I know 9....I know 7-6 means were beck...I know short and fat, I don't know 125?

---------------------------------------------
--- IrishDawg22 wrote:

125-64-11

I think we got both programs covered over time.

Even includes a current 9 game streak.

How bad was it??

Just healthy discussion, no flame intended.

---------------------------------------------
--- M4Dux wrote:

Irish, did you read this?

forums.scout.com/mb.asp...&t=11184033

You shouldn't worry about Oregon you should worry about beating WSU.  If Sark has another average season, how long before he loses his job?

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
--- IrishDawg22 wrote:

125-64-11

I think we got both programs covered over time.

Even includes a current 9 game streak.

How bad was it??

Just healthy discussion, no flame intended.

---------------------------------------------

Let's go with 184-98-15. Why leave out the Beavers?

The question for you is:

How good was it? And how long has it been over?

---------------------------------------------
--- GGG19 wrote:

Take away Kelly, and lets talk mediocre.

---------------------------------------------


Yours truly,

Don James

Glad to see you agree. Love your show!

Not trying to bash a local kid, but he is going to struggle in the Pac 12.

JadeDuck wrote:
They have ONE O-line commit thus far, 3* from PDX. Yup, they're killing it on the O and D lines. Too funny.

Sarkingham will never understand that it starts with the guys in the trenches. He's too much in love with QB's, WR's and RB's.

Go Ducks!

Ya know, it's kinda nice to have some Huskies stopping by to banter with since we can't visit their free board.

Give them credit, they may be able to beat WSU next year?