NT

I like 3 better than 6:30.  6:30 puts me as super hungover come Monday.  3 leaves me as only slightly hungover...unless of course we win on a last second fg and then i'm super hungover no matter what the start time is. 

mezmrin wrote: I like 3 better than 6:30.  6:30 puts me as super hungover come Monday.  3 leaves me as only slightly hungover...unless of course we win on a last second fg and then i'm super hungover no matter what the start time is. 

It's a hell of a lot better than a 1 O' clock start too.  We were running late that morning waiting on people, so I didn't even get a chance to eat until after the game. Lucky I was still standing drinking all day on an empty stomach.

Actually looking forward to firing up the grill at noon and not having anything to do but sit back with a cold one. Last weekend was exhausting.

As for the Superbowl,  I've long said that they should play the game on Saturday... I mean, no more college football, biggest party game of the year, and we all have to suffer Monday if we want to really enjoy it.

I've long said the Monday after the Super Bowl should be a national holiday!  This way, we have a short week of work to help

they won't move the game till one. The network TV makes a full day of shows with the advertisements. 

Also when the Falcons win, there will be a victory party at Bubba's

The Falcons won't win...so the time is irrelevant....

Gatom wrote: That unless the Pats make it they will move the time to 1:00pm and out of prime time due to the networks not really caring that much.

Honestly do we always get the worse start times in the playoffs?

I know what you mean. It feels as if you were worth less than the Pats in the eyes of the media.

We are small market teams, but we should be treated with the same respect in my opinion. 
Apparently it's all about the money for the NFL, as networks make more money with advertisement during prime time, and they might think that if the Pats are in more people will be watching.

bubbamoniz wrote: The Falcons won't win...so the time is irrelevant....

Where are the Saints again? Oh thats right..no where to be seen.

Enjoy being a fan of a franchise in decline, ********.

I'm really starting to think they're just trying to piss us off to create contreversy, and thus ratings... It's the only reason I can figure that they have Heath Evans and Sharper constantly trashing us on the NFLN. Could you have picked anyone more biased?

I just turn it off now when they start talking about us (for once anyway, since they have to)

B3eenthehedges wrote: I'm really starting to think they're just trying to piss us off to create contreversy, and thus ratings... It's the only reason I can figure that they have Heath Evans and Sharper constantly trashing us on the NFLN. Could you have picked anyone more biased?

I just turn it off now when they start talking about us (for once anyway, since they have to)

Omg true lol, haven't thought about that. Sharper likes to talk, but Heath always seemed to be a righteous man imo. I don't have NFLN though.

---------------------------------------------
--- ACCBigFourFan wrote:

bubbamoniz wrote: The Falcons won't win...so the time is irrelevant....

Where are the Saints again? Oh thats right..no where to be seen.

Enjoy being a fan of a franchise in decline, ********.

---------------------------------------------

And yet we still have more Rings that Atlanta! BAHAHAHAHA

ACCBigFourFan wrote:

bubbamoniz wrote: The Falcons won't win...so the time is irrelevant....

Where are the Saints again? Oh thats right..no where to be seen.

Enjoy being a fan of a franchise in decline, ********.

The same place where the Failclowns will be Superbowl weekend...sitting at home...enjoy being a fan of a team that chokes as much as the Cowboys...talk about decline....