|
Jake Long thoughts
|
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 10:27 AM
Jake Long thoughts
Last edited 12/21/2012 11:15 AM by mezmrin
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 10:59 AM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
No
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 11:16 AM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
because?
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 11:28 AM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
We dont need him, we can resign Baker alot cheaper, LT has not been the problem at all, Long is no better than Baker right now. Baker has finally got healthy and playing at a very high level...What we need is to move Konz to center and chitcan Blalock. Reynolds was doing great at Rg till he got hurt, we need to find a mauler at LG and we are set.... helll Long is not even all that good....
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 11:33 AM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
Reynolds? It's too early for you to be smoking up 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 12:00 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
mezmrin wrote: Reynolds? It's too early for you to be smoking up  2013 LT - Baker LG- Monster rookie C- Konz RG - Reynolds RT - Clabo
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 12:07 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
Reynolds is awful. Did you watch different games than I did? Clabo isn't any better. Blalock is OK in my book. I still don't trust Baker. Konz is a +. Hawley is a no go as a starter. Johnson as well. 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 12:23 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
mezmrin wrote: Reynolds is awful. Did you watch different games than I did? Clabo isn't any better. Blalock is OK in my book. I still don't trust Baker. Konz is a +. Hawley is a no go as a starter. Johnson as well.  Mez, Reynolds was beasting and our absolute best O lineman till he got hurt this year..Blalock sucks and is ranked at the bottom of all NFL O lineman....I got no problem replacing Clabo, but dont know if we get to it this year.....this years problems have been McClure, blalock and RG after Reynolds went down ....Konz is now coming around and should be a beast....move him to center, get rid of blalocks sucky azz, and a healthy reynolds at RG, looks alot better IMO ....we do not need to go after Jake Long ....
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
- ugaja

- Hall of Famer
- Rating: 1.8/5 this site
- 6332 posts this site
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 1:31 PM
RE: Jake Long thoughts
i guess mike johnson is done then
to whoever had the next years starting line thread, how many drafts can we take interior guys early
Last edited 12/21/2012 1:32 PM by ugaja
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 3:47 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
that's what I'm talking about! 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 3:56 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
Do you guys even realize how bad Jake Long has sucked this year, while Baker is ranked toward the top of the league ? .....and that if they dont franchise him, some desperate team will give him 10 million a year ? ....fk it man, I give up, Jake Long aint nothing but a name....
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 4:28 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
he sucks at zone blocking, but he's a 4 time pro bowler when you say take their best DE and keep him away from the QB. I'm not saying we definitely should, but it's worth discussing I think.  Baker is playing OK now, but is that the norm or the exception? I'm not sure.
|
|
Reply |
Quote |
|
|
Posted: 12/21/2012 4:43 PM
Re: Jake Long thoughts
mezmrin wrote: he sucks at zone blocking, but he's a 4 time pro bowler when you say take their best DE and keep him away from the QB. I'm not saying we definitely should, but it's worth discussing I think. Baker is playing OK now, but is that the norm or the exception? I'm not sure. We can not afford him bro .....most Fin fans think he is used up anyway ....no one knows for sure about Baker, it is a contract year, but we should get him for a good price, and I have to admit he has finally turned it around .......I think Konz at center, a big upgrade at LG, and healthy Reynolds at RG will be lights out for us ..I mean Reynolds looked like all pro before he went down, it took him an entire year to settle in at G , but he has it now ......... 
|
|
Reply |
Quote |