Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
Inbox

Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE

  • DerekLarsson2
  • Five Star General
  • Rating: 2.9/5 this site
  • 1006 posts this site

Posted: 10/15/2012 9:19 PM

Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE Post Rating (3 votes)





Early in his career, Belichick made a real name for himself as a Defensive Coach.  One of his strengths was confounding Offenses with a variety of corner blitzes, zone blitzes, and different "looks", i.e. schemes....

But those days are long gone.

For the past 7 years, Bill Belichick has consistently presided over one of the very worst Defenses in the entire NFL.  Last year the Patriots were 31st in the NFL against the pass.  The year before that the Patriots were 30th in the NFL against the pass. This year, the Patriots are 28th in the NFL against the pass. That is his record.

And despite stockpiling Draft picks, and having very big Draft days over the course of 7 years (with multiple selections to pick from), and 7 years to also bring-in whatever free agents he wished, the legacy of Bill Belichick has become that anyone can throw on his Defenses and he doesn't know how to stop it......top-tier QBs...bottom-tier QBs....rookie QBs....you name it, just grab a football and heave it up there, and the longer..the better.  

His Defensive Secondary units scare nobody.

And Belichick's solution to this fundamental Team problem has been to bring-in all sorts of mysterious draftees, cast-offs, and free-agents who have come and gone; from the likes of:  Shawn Springs...to...Duane Starks....to....Dexter Reed....to....Darius Butler...to...Terrance Wheatly...to...Jonathon Wilhite...to...Kyle Arrington...to...Ras Dowling...to.....Gus Scott.....to....Great Scott! (just kidding)........to.......Dennard....to....McCourty ....to....Moore ...to....Bodden...to....Earthwind Morland (or whatever).....to.....McGowen.....to....Trevon Wilson.....to......Tank Williams.........etc.........you get the idea...

All of whom would define the lousiest Defensive Backfield you'll ever see.

Meanwhile, we see coaches like Pete Carroll come in, and in just 2-3 years build one of the NFL's top-rated Defenses in Seattle.  Now if Pete Carroll can do that (and he already has done that),  then what does that say about Bill Belichick-?

One of two things must be true:

.  Either his judgement of talent, and his selection criteria when picking and dafting players for the Defensive Secondary (low-rated, no-name, undersized CBs when other choices are available) is consistently incompetent.

.  The way that his CBs and Safeties are coached and taught, however talented they may be, prevent them from ever growing or developing into legitimate players (instead of improving.....they always regress).


____


The best Patriots cornerback in recent memory was Ty Law.  But it was Bill Parcells, and not Belichick, who picked him (Parcells also drafted Lawyer Malloy as well).

But how many standout Defensive Secondary players has Belichick ever been responsible for picking in his entire decade+ with the Patriots?  Just two:  Asante Samuel and Rodney Harrison.....and that's it!  As for all the rest, can you say 30th in the NFL against the Pass?

Some 40 or 50 guys picked by Belichick have all come and gone in the Defensive Secondary, none of whom could play worth a damn, or at a sufficient level to change the Patriots from being one of the very worst NFL Teams against the pass. The only reason why the Patriots win any games, is because they typically score tons of points (and also lead among the NFL in that catagory) thanks to a certain record-setting Quarterback.

But year-after-year, Belichick is completely unable and clueless to fix the Secondary.
Belichick's legacy is now:  No matter who the players are, or what the year -- you can always throw the ball against a Belichick team.....

He's had 7 years, and it is beyond his ability to ever pick players that would fix it.

Last edited 10/16/2012 3:10 PM by DerekLarsson2

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/15/2012 10:20 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 


It kills me to agree with you DL.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/15/2012 10:43 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE Post Rating (1 vote)


I maintain that BB's biggest glaring weakness is his fixation with "promoting from within." They have people coaching the secondary with zero actual NFL playing experience, and in some cases they're not much older than the players themselves.

I honestly don't think the players in the secondary are as bad as their performance indicates. They look lost, hesitant, slow. And that's not a physical problem, because we know they're all fast enough, we know they can make plays. We've seen it.

BB's stubbornness is the real devil in disguise here. He simply refuses to hire from outside the organization and get the coaching support the team really needs.

As DL pointed out, this team with BB as HC won SB's with guys like Randall Gay and Earthwind Moreland in the secondary. Hardly All Pro players. But at that time he had Romeo as DC. He had Mangina as secondary coach and Joel Collier as his assistant. Is there that same level of talent in the chain of command now? I think not.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/15/2012 11:38 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 


I knew derek would show up and talk about this defense but i do have to agree.I think the scheme sucks and poor coaching.I would like to see Dowling get an opportunity at CB and BB is playing this guy in dime packages.I think BB is hard headed.Its time for change at the top and they have to bring in a DC with a mind.This defense has been a joke the last couple of years.The scheme stinks!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/15/2012 11:46 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 


Dennard has looked good. Dowling deserves a shot. McCourty looks good playing S or Nickel. Moore does OK when he can just play his man and not have to do astrophysics trying to figure out where he's supposed to be. Arrington is OK when he has help and can try to make a play. Chung is real good when he's not second-guessing what to do. And even Ebner looks good in run support.

This is fixable. They're not as bad as they look.

Simplify this mess so the DB's can play aggressively instead of being a step behind the play every snap because they have to think too much.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/16/2012 9:41 AM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 


I also agree with Derek....though to an extent.  Belichick has done a very good job retooling the front 7 through the draft and FA (Spikes, Mayo, Hightower, and Jones).  Its the back 4 that has been the issue.  The problem is 3 of them (McCourty, Chung, and Arrington) have all had periods where they have been very, very good.  I just don't see how it can be the players - you don't go from being a good NFL player to just sucking.  It has to be the coaching the and the schemes being used....doesn't it?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/16/2012 10:35 AM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 



dokgonzo wrote: I maintain that BB's biggest glaring weakness is his fixation with "promoting from within." They have people coaching the secondary with zero actual NFL playing experience, and in some cases they're not much older than the players themselves.

I honestly don't think the players in the secondary are as bad as their performance indicates. They look lost, hesitant, slow. And that's not a physical problem, because we know they're all fast enough, we know they can make plays. We've seen it.

BB's stubbornness is the real devil in disguise here. He simply refuses to hire from outside the organization and get the coaching support the team really needs.

As DL pointed out, this team with BB as HC won SB's with guys like Randall Gay and Earthwind Moreland in the secondary. Hardly All Pro players. But at that time he had Romeo as DC. He had Mangina as secondary coach and Joel Collier as his assistant. Is there that same level of talent in the chain of command now? I think not.

RITE ON, brother........................biggrin

Reply | Quote
  • DerekLarsson2
  • Five Star General
  • Rating: 2.9/5 this site
  • 1006 posts this site

Posted: 10/16/2012 3:59 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE Post Rating (3 votes)




 
I also question the coaching assistants, along with Belichick's coaching as well, especially you wonder about basic techniques....such as looking back for the Football, and knocking balls down from the air.  Simple things (which players should know anyway).

But I don't see that as the core issue here.

Bill Belichick consistently drafts undersized, slow-footed, low-rated, no-name players for his Seconday, and skips over all the other choices, and the other players which other Coaches seek out (with success), and other Draft Analysts/Experts project as successful CBs and Safeties.

--

The most recent example here is Tavon Wilson, a no-name guy who was on nobody's 2012 NFL Draft board, and who was on nobody's 2012 "mock-draft" list -- even in the 6th round!   Let me repeat that:  Even in the 6TH ROUND!!!

 

Yet Bill Belichick plucked this guy out of obscurity (when no other GM would have), and made him his second round pick!  Second-Round?  Come on!  This was just beyond incompetence.

Tavon was a guy who played well on special teams in College, and that's about it (which is the reason why nobody ever had him on any of their Boards).  Even the so-called "Highlight Films" of him on YouTube showed him easily getting beaten in coverage situations, and I mean very easily.  I had posted about him after the selection, warning that one Draft report written about him even stated:  "He's a liability in pass coverage".  Hello McFly?

Now, I'm no Football genuis here, but when even I can find YouTube film of this college player getting badly torched in one-on-one coverage situations, my mind tells me that ....hmmmm, there might just be better Cornerbacks in the Draft than this guyYa think?  I wonder how high Pete Carroll rated this guy compared to the other options.

Yet out of hundreds of players, this is Belichick's man?  This was his idea of a top CB?  And he is even willing to waste a second-round draft pick on thatThis is the real problem that is going on here.

So there are just too many players he picks that, while they may have some minor abilities,  they simply fail to come anywhere close to the textbook description of a proper NFL coverage Cornerback.


So how can a "smart" man be so Dumb?

I believe this comes largely from Belichick's love affair with Special Teams players. He began his career as a Special Teams coach.  I think that he wants to pigeon-hole all of his Cornerbacks and his Safeties into double-duty Special Teams/Defensive players.   And he spends far, far too much time evaluating players for just their Special Teams skills, than he does for their actual coverage skills and important coverage matchup attributes (coverage denials, speed, playmaking, height, arm-reach, etc.).

Other coaches and GMs don't do that.  They focus on somebody who they know can actually cover people one-on-one, and then coach the special team stuff later on if needed.  But Bill Belichick gets his wet dreams over special teams utility men, and then thinks that he can later coach them into matching-up with the best NFL Skill Recievers and TEs in the League.  But reality proves him wrong.

It's a reverse logic going on in his head, and that is why Belichick drafts only dud-after-dud-after-dud-after-dud for his Secondary players. When he picks players, he's not wearing a GM's hat (as he should)......he's still wearing his old Special Teams Coach hat  (thinking as a Special Teams Coach).  He just can't let go of that.

Anyway, that's my theory....


 

Last edited 10/16/2012 4:32 PM by DerekLarsson2

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/16/2012 4:29 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


I feel its coaching and scheme.Dowling was drafted in the second round and he is only getting 6 snaps?I wanna see a change on coaching!Former players have come out and bashed the technique of these guys including Ty Law.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/16/2012 6:05 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


Players seem to get in BB's doghouse and never get out. Dowling and Vereen both seem to be in that category. If they're not on the injury report, and what's happening on the field sucks, why not give these players a chance to get out of the doghouse?

Again - BB's stubbornness showing through.

Some of the DB's even told reporters today a lot of the problem was technique. Again, this is all pointing to coaching. That's the common thread (despite DL's theory that anyone not drafted by Parcells is useless).
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/16/2012 9:46 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's track record on DEFENSE 



DerekLarsson2 wrote:


Bill Belichick consistently drafts undersized, slow-footed, low-rated, no-name players for his Seconday, and skips over all the other choices, and the other players which other Coaches seek out (with success), and other Draft Analysts/Experts project as successful CBs and Safeties.


There are usually 1 or 2 CBs and 1 or 2 safeties that are thought of as pretty safe bets to be successful.  And those guys are generally gone long before the Patriots get to pick.

I wouldn't be too quick to cite Wilson as an example of crappy drafting.  Overall, he has looked pretty solid so far and has made several impact plays already this season.

Who are "all the other choices" you refer to anyways?  I guess you can go to the nfl wiki draft site and scroll through the rounds until you find a guy that has been selected to the pro-bowl.  The last several drafts have been amazingly weak in the secondary.  I'm curious who all these other guys are.
Reply | Quote
  • DerekLarsson2
  • Five Star General
  • Rating: 2.9/5 this site
  • 1006 posts this site

Posted: 10/16/2012 9:51 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE Post Rating (3 votes)



"Again, this is all pointing to coaching. That's the common thread (despite DL's theory that anyone not drafted by Parcells is useless)."

 


1.  I was clearly speaking to the players that he has drafted for the Secondary, and not    "anyone not drafted by Parcells".

2. It's not just coaching.  Many things that players either do or don't do are instinctive, and cannot even really be "taught" to begin with (like jumping routes at the right time).  It's called talent.  And simple, basic things like looking back for the football, or knocking the ball down, etc., are things that any decent player who has played Football should already know how to do all by himself regardless of any "coaching".  And if they need to be constantly reminded of such things, again that is on the player and not on the 'Coaching'.

3. You cannot possibly defend players like:  Shawn Springs, Duane Starks, Dexter Reed, Darius Butler, Terrance Wheatly, Jonathon Wilhite, Kyle Arrington, Ras Dowling, Gus Scott, Dennard, McCourty, Moore, Bodden, Earthwind Morland, McGowen, Trevon Wilson, Tank Williams.........etc, and make the claim that these were the best available Secondary players to choose from?   They were not. They are inadequate players.  Many of them have been total busts on other teams as well (with other coaching staffs), or they are completely out-of-the-NFL altogether now.

4. None of the Secondary players that Belichick has picked, have ever gone on to become Star players, or even decent players on any other team either (under any other "scheme" or coach) -- except for Asante Samuel which proves the point.  

So the conclusion is inescapable that his judgement and evaluation (and criteria used) of Secondary players is apalling and incompetent.  The players that he picks are bad, and that's what the record over many, many years clearly shows.

__

I'm not saying that the coaching is great either, but just look at all the rejects that have come and gone, and come and gone over the last 7 years, and it is breathtaking.  Had he picked even just 2 or 3 more people of the calibre of Asante Samuel  -- then we wouldn't even be having this conversation right now.

Put it this way.  I like Pete Carroll's Secondary picks better than the anything that Belichick has picked.  If we could swap the Seattle Secondary in place of The Patriots Secondary right now ...then we wouldn't be having this conversation now as well.

 
 



Last edited 10/16/2012 9:54 PM by DerekLarsson2

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/16/2012 10:52 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


DL, there is always a sub-text and multiple flash-backs to past discussions in your posts. But anyway ...

BB looks for players who have positional flexibility. I think that's one thing that's really unique to the way the Pats handle personnel. The upside of this is that this roster is able to absorb injuries like no other.

I could buy the "these guys all suck" argument if it weren't for the fact that we've seen all the existing players do well over multiple games. And for the rookies, the only outrider was Wilson. And Wilson has played better than a lot of the 2nd and 3rd year guys so far. The kid can tackle, and that's been lacking for the last few seasons.

You are also ignoring some context. Why were guys like Earthwind and Gay playing in the SB? Were these guys that BB went out and looked for? Hell no. Everyone else was injured and he grabbed the best talent he could find at the moment. Those guys have as much to do with something like not keeping Samuel as they do with the price of eggs. Not even related.

But, lets look at this logically. For several years now they've brought in DB's, most of whom excelled in college. And what we've seen happen is they'll have great 1st or 2nd years (McC, Butler, Arrington). And then, as if by magic, and while they're still in the prime of their careers, they turn to stone. So, what's more likely? That some mysterious force causes these players to simultaneously become physically and mentally lame - at the same time? Or that what they're being coached to do is screwing up their natural ability?
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/17/2012 9:25 AM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 



DerekLarsson2 wrote:

Put it this way.  I like Pete Carroll's Secondary picks better than the anything that Belichick has picked.  If we could swap the Seattle Secondary in place of The Patriots Secondary right now ...then we wouldn't be having this conversation now as well

You mean that secondary that just gave up 400 yards and poorly covered receivers for most of the game?  Taht same secondary that would have given up 500 yards if Brady didn't bounce and overthrow so many open receivers in the 2nd half?  That same secondary that showed the same horrible play the receiver, not the ball technique?

Personally, I was very unimpressed with the Seahawks secondary.  That was the only Seahawks gave I have seen this year, but I thought their DL and LBs were clearly the strength of their defense last weekend.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/17/2012 11:07 AM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


I can only hope that we could play them again this season, if you know what I mean!! I truly don't think that it would be close!!
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/19/2012 2:39 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


BB gave a long ramble about the game-plan approach to offense (and kind of defense) in his press conference today. Here's the transcript. What's amazing is that he went on for that long and basically, other than reliving some history, didn't say a damn thing.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/20/2012 9:18 AM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


I believe the big picture here is that, regardless of the causes for their defensive problems, something has to change. Whatever they are doing is not working. Some kind of adjustment has to made. Granted, the Patriots tend to improve defensively over the course of the season, so maybe that will be the case again. Now is the time for it, if it's going to happen.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/20/2012 2:36 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


And another thing that ticks me off is this prevent-defense play-not-to-lose mindset this team gets into in the 4th when they have a sizable lead. You know, just before they blow that lead.

There was a time when if they were up 17 in the 4th, or whatever, they'd put in some backups. Yeah, they may make mistakes - unlike the starters who play sooooo well in the closing minutes of games. But they also come onto the field with a ton of energy and play aggressively at 100%.

Given how crappy the starters seem to do in the 4th, why not put Brace and Bequette and Dowling and even Ebner out there when they go up by more than 2 scores in the 4th. Let the kids blitz and attack instead having everyone sit back on their heels in prevent mode.

This team used to do a much better job making the most of it's roster. And it used to have a real killer instinct for closing games.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 10/22/2012 3:44 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


you cant do everything as a head coach. you just set the mood of the team and your staff deals with it...if the defence is not good for bill belichick he should consider changing the defensive coordinator
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/23/2012 2:31 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


Parcells never won a Superbowl without Belichick. Belichick never won a Superbowl without Crennel and Weiss. See the trend. NO matter how good a head coach you are, there has to be a good staff to work with you. Otherwise all you get is disappointment.

Chance favors the Prepared Mind.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 10/23/2012 4:26 PM

Re: Bill Belichick's Track Record on DEFENSE 


One mark of a really great leader is having people as good or better than they are reporting to them. For all BB's skill and smarts, he fails that litmus test miserably since 2005. Romeo was as good a DC as Bill has been, and Chahlie is still a better OC than Bill will ever be. Romeo always knew just when to blitz, and Weiss always knew when to pull some wild play out of his bag of tricks.

What's even weirder is that neither Weiss nor Crennel have enjoyed the same success after leaving BB. Weiss had a couple good years at ND, and it's been a trail of tears since. Romeo is well liked by the players he coaches, but on his own he can't lead a team as a HC.

But you put those 3 together and something happens.

Matt Patricia hasn't impressed me as DC. The secondary is a disaster and the success of the front 7 is more due to the high level of talent there than anything he's been doing. I would have been happier with Pepper as DC - at least he'd blitz and be aggressive.

Even if the team is stuck with the OC and DC, at least they can hire some decent position coaches so that the DB's look for the ball and the WR's catch it.
Reply | Quote