|
(Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
|
|
|
Posted: 9/10/2008 6:45 PM
(Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I'm a Seahawk fan but when I root for a team in the AFC. Its the Patriots! Ever since i seen Tom Brady play i knew he could be great.
Matt Cassel i think could possibly get the job done. Give this guy a chance. Im a huge USC fan and yeah he never got his reps there but there was a reason for him playing there or even being a backup. Thats because he was a good QB. USC produces real good QBs. So i say let this guy have a chance. Lets see how he does this weekend and then we can judge him afterwards
Last edited 10/3/2008 9:44 AM by Morpheus11
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/10/2008 6:51 PM
Re: IMO: Matt Cassel
Thx alaska, - but it's gonna take far more than one week to get back on track. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/10/2008 7:01 PM
Re: IMO: Matt Cassel
oh no doubt. But i wouldnt really think its smart to get another QB so he would start right away. Matt Cassel knows the system better then any other QB that will come in. O'Sullivan has a better chance then a new QB added...As long as he gets the job done. I wouldnt worry to much. Just increase the running game. and step up on the Defense
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/10/2008 7:32 PM
Re: IMO: Matt Cassel
Exactly, - the defense has to pick things up, make the big stops, and keep the games within reach.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2008 11:39 AM
Re: IMO: Matt Cassel
FOX NFL Sunday Roundtable: Week 2 by FOXSports.com  Every week, the experts of FOX NFL Sunday will candidly reveal their observations and make their opinions known as they prepare for their top-rated pregame telecast — seen each Sunday at 12 p.m. ET/9 a.m. PT. We'll share with you some of the highlights and observations from Curt, Terry, Howie, Jimmy and Strahan grabbed from their weekly conference call with insider John Czarnecki and pregame show producer Scott Ackerson. This week, Czar probes FOX NFL Sunday on some of the big games of the week, plus the question of whether Matt Cassel can be as cool as Tom Brady. CZAR: How do you think the Patriots are going to be without their MVP, Tom Brady? Jimmy Johnson: "Personally, I think the Patriots like Matt Cassel as an athlete and may even think he has a better arm than Brady. The whole key is whether or not he's going to be accurate and also how does he react under pressure or when the game gets really tight." NFL Week 2 Terry Bradshaw: "I can remember watching him a couple years ago when we were in New England for a preseason game telling you guys I thought he threw a great ball and had a great release. The thing is, though, he never even started a game in college at USC." JJ: "In this game against the Jets, the Patriots know that Brett Favre will give them some chances to make some plays on defense. The key is whether or not New England will make the plays when Brett puts a ball up for grabs like he did in Miami last Sunday. That one pass could have been an interception and instead it goes for a touchdown." Curt Menefee: "Talking to Pete Carroll, he admitted that Cassel has a big arm and is mobile. But he also said that he's the kind of guy who gets nervous and really tries to do too much. You have to stay on him and calm him down and keep him in check. He said the thing he would be most concerned about is Cassel making the right decisions." TB: "I think he is smart and he's been in this system now for four years. But he hasn't really started a game since high school." CM: "He threw 33 passes in college." JJ: "Last season he screwed up the Miami game and Bill Belichick had to bring Brady back into the game. Remember, that?" TB: "The really good quarterbacks that are successful in the NFL aren't necessarily the most talented, the guy who can throw it 90 yards and hit a target and run a 4.4 40-yard. But the guy who can handle the heat and stand in there, the ones who have the most poise." JJ: "The Patriots didn't pick up another quarterback because we all know the guys that are unemployed all have flaws. I think the Pats felt that they had to go with the quarterbacks who really know their system. Had it been the offseason, they might have had some interest in, say, Chris Simms."
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 12:10 PM
(Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
A lot of our threads are starting to look the same with the "Matt Cassel is not the answer" theme. So I thought I'd open it up for discussion.
Do we think he can get better as he gets more and more starts under his belt? I'm not gonna throw him to the curb after one bad game, especially since I didn't see the game, but at the same time I'd sure love to have a better QB in there.
As far as I'm concerned there is absolutely nothing out there that they could bring in off the street to play QB this year, and that includes Culpepper.
The only other option is a trade, and that seems highly unlikely.
So......... let's just go ahead and talk about what we'd like to see them do, whether it's keep Cassel in there, switch to O'Connell or Gutz or sign or trade for someone else. If you think they should sign or trade for someone else, then be specific. Who would you like to see them get?
Personally, I'd be interested to see them go after Marc Bulger who has been benched in St Louis and it is being reported he no longer wants to play for Linehan (is there anyone on that team who DOES want to play for him?). Certainly this is a highly unlikely trade. What would you have to give up and would Bulger be willing to come in on a one year contract? I'm sure he still wants to start somewhere. But hypothetically speaking, that's an interesting move they could consider in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 12:29 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Good idea to consolidate the the discussion. I want to add that "half" thoughts are of no use here. If you think Cassell should go, then come up with an alternative. Do not just say "get a veteran", give a name, a scenario, etc...
Don't just throw mud at the wall, add some substance. Regarding Bulger, I think he just signed a large extension. The Pats cannot fit him under the cap and would not want to pay 2 starting QBs next year. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 2:01 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I think it's too late to get a QB in here now via trade/FA. An older veteran doesn't have the mobility he'll need to deal with our porous o-line. And a new guy will need weeks to learn the system - so we'd have to rely on Cassel at least til mid-season anyway.
If O'Connell is the guy they think will succeed Brady, may as well give him some serious playing time now. Cassel - for whatever reasons - just isn't getting it done. When he plays "well" - meaning no mistakes - this is a low-yield offense. There's no excuse for that with Moss, Welker, Faulk, etc. out there. The o-line isn't helping, but look at the talent around Cassel. This is not a 16 point-per-game roster.
I think Cassel's contract is up next season anyway, and unless he makes an astounding turn around in the next couple of weeks I don't see him here next year. So why not invest the time in Gutz or O'C? In other words - it's an opportunity this season to see if the #2 and #3 QB's are "the future" or not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 2:15 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Parcells grabbed probably the only qb that could help this season. Now it's like changing horses in the middle of the stream - not a good idea. Bringing in a new qb with less than one season left, makes no sense, - it's too late.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 3:06 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
This is like the 2nd or 3rd time I've seen a "Bring in Bulger" post around here. The Rams signed the guy to a 60 million-ish contract last year. Hes not leaving that team, if he did, this team wouldnt want him. He is a starter, we have a starter (injured). He aint jumpin ship to take less money and be a backup. As far as Cassel. I dont understand how you can say he's had one bad game? Every game hes played in hes been bad. Dont kid yourself. He was terrible in the Preseason, terrible in garbage time games over the last 4 years, and did just enough to not loose vs KC. He has not shown any indication as to why he should be a Pats backup QB, let alone on the roster taking up someone who could be a viable back up's spot. The only thing that makes senese to me is that BB does not see something he can bring in that would be game ready in time that is worth trading/paying for. This I can understand. I honestly just think BB and SP got together and looked at who was on the market be it off the street, or via trade, and then said, by the time player X is ready to go we may be in too deep a hole, so lets just save our money and use who we got. Why waste a draft pick (or picks) trying to get someone in here, or spend money that could be used elsewhere next season. Sticking with Cassel tells me they just dont want to hurt the team next season.
Now perhaps they are getting O'Connel ready for a mid to end of the season switch. I could see this as well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 3:21 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
BradyIsMyHero wrote: This is like the 2nd or 3rd time I've seen a "Bring in Bulger" post around here. The Rams signed the guy to a 60 million-ish contract last year. Hes not leaving that team, if he did, this team wouldnt want him. He is a starter, we have a starter (injured). He aint jumpin ship to take less money and be a backup. As far as Cassel. I dont understand how you can say he's had one bad game? Every game hes played in hes been bad. Dont kid yourself. He was terrible in the Preseason, terrible in garbage time games over the last 4 years, and did just enough to not loose vs KC. He has not shown any indication as to why he should be a Pats backup QB, let alone on the roster taking up someone who could be a viable back up's spot. The only thing that makes senese to me is that BB does not see something he can bring in that would be game ready in time that is worth trading/paying for. This I can understand. I honestly just think BB and SP got together and looked at who was on the market be it off the street, or via trade, and then said, by the time player X is ready to go we may be in too deep a hole, so lets just save our money and use who we got. Why waste a draft pick (or picks) trying to get someone in here, or spend money that could be used elsewhere next season. Sticking with Cassel tells me they just dont want to hurt the team next season.
Now perhaps they are getting O'Connel ready for a mid to end of the season switch. I could see this as well.
Sorry if I haven't seen any Bulger threads. Like I said, it's not something they can, or would, do. It's hypothetical. IF they could do something to bring someone else in, then like I said that would be an interesting option. I'm NOT saying they should try to get Bulger. ((Thought I explained that rather clearly but I guess not)) As for the "one bad game" comment, I was talking about the team, not Cassel specifically. If you're comparing him to Brady then ALL his games are going to be bad. What I'm asking for is if you don't think Cassel should be the QB, THEN WHO SHOULD BE???? Everybody's so quick to burn Matt Cassel but they don't offer any other choices.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 3:29 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I am firmly in the "Rome and QBs are not built in a couple of weeks playing/practicing as the #1 in the NFL" camp. I think you stick with Cassell. To me the most intriguing FA out there is Tim Rattay. Boo hiss, yea what has Ratty ever shown? "To date, in 37 games, including 18 starts, Rattay has completed 429-of-711 passes in his career for 4,848 yards with 31 touchdowns and 23 interceptions for a passer rating of 80.4." thank you wikipedia.
Is Tim Rattay a perfect solution? No. Has he shown flashes of production in the NFL? Yes. Could Randy Moss and Wes Welker make him a better player? Probably.
Again I think you stick with what you have, but if people insist on suggesting going to get a FA, then at least give Rattay a look.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 3:48 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
BradyIsMyHero wrote: I dont understand how you can say he's had one bad game? Every game hes played in hes been bad. Dont kid yourself. He was terrible in the Preseason, terrible in garbage time games over the last 4 years, and did just enough to not loose vs KC. He has not shown any indication as to why he should be a Pats backup QB, let alone on the roster taking up someone who could be a viable back up's spot. I completely disagree with this. He played very well in the 4th quarter against Washington last year. He played very well against Miami in the season finale in 2005. Other than that he has had only a few minutes of playing time over the last four years. So it's not true that he has been terrible for 4 years. He's barely played and in those times when he played he was good in some and not so good in others. If BB had taken the advice of his critics last year when they were blowing teams out and given Cassel some more playing time, then maybe we'd have more of a sample to judge him on.. and maybe he'd be a better player now. I also disagree that he was terrible in this preseason. He threw the ball very well (with the exception of one really bad pass against Tampa) and completed a high percentage of his passes. It wasn't his fault he was trying to target a clueless Chad Jackson on many of those throws. It also was not his fault the defenses were pouring through his O-Line like Niagara Falls and pounding him into the ground. I'm not saying he's a great QB and that I wouldn't like someone better, but he's definitely better than O'Connell or Gutz. Yeah, remember Gutz? The one everyone thought should have Cassel's job as the number 2? The guy who kept turning the ball over and throwing horrible interceptions against 3rd and 4th stringers in the preseason? If Cassel had made some of those throws everyone would be calling for his head, but Gutz gets away with it simply because he's not Cassel. Sorry guys, but Cassel is the best option they have and O'Connell or Gutz should only be playing this year if they have in fact given up on this season and want to prepare these two to be the backup next year when Cassel is gone.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 3:58 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Bradyismyhero, I think you are under estimating how important rythem is to an offense and espeically a QB. Matt Cassell has never had the opportunity to develop a rythem while leading the offense. He still has not. But now he has the chance. The jury is still out. I agree that Cassell has shown signs of good and bad over the past four years, but to expect a guy to get plugged in at random times and in the preseason and not expect problems is not reasonable.
|
|
- Patsie
- Lt General (Three St
- 738 posts this site
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 4:09 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I think MC will be fine after a couple of weeks practicing. Who wouldnt be nervous having Moss and Welker ? He just started, and apparently Belichick likes what he sees at practice from MC. He must be hitting his recievers in practice.
Pats got caught unaware, but the next Miami game they will have practiced against those plays.
.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 5:24 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
QB Matt Cassel is using the bye week to work on his mechanics and how defenses are approaching the Patriots with him at quarterback. He is taking the advice of Tom Brady and remaining upbeat despite a lackluster performance last Sunday. "We have had conversations since last week," said Cassel. "A lot of them just came down to, 'Look, it happens and there are going to be times when you lose. You just have to stay positive and know that you are going to come out and continue to work hard and get better.' " -- Boston Globe
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 6:03 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
My first choice remains Jeff Garcia if he is still available. However, I am starting to lean towards the opinion in that time is running out. There are others........... See September 11 postings under "Garcia" where my opinion is clearly stated. The man's got decent stats and PO experience.
Below Source: Weikipedia(sp) Jeffrey Jason Garcia (born February 24, 1970 in Gilroy, California) is an American football quarterback for the Tampa Bay
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 6:51 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I also agree with keeping Cassel. Don't forget on his first drive in the first quarter against the Chiefs, Cassel had a 10-play, 98-yard drive that ended in a 10-yard scoring strike to Randy Moss. He also threw a 51 yard pass to Moss in that game. So we know he's capable.
.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:02 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
2ND Selection ~ New England would be the best team he's ever been on and, reunited with old friend, R. Moss. Source: NFL.com Daunte Culpepper Height: 6-4 Weight: 260 Age: 31 Born: 1/28/1977 Ocala , FL College: Central Florida Experience: 9 Seasons | Career Stats more | | Season | Team | | Passing | Rushing | Fumbles | | G | GS | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | Avg | TD | Int | Sck | SckY | Rate | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | FUM | Lost | | 2007 | Oakland Raiders | 7 | 6 | 108 | 186 | 58.1 | 1,331 | 7.2 | 5 | 5 | 21 | 130 | 78.0 | 20 | 40 | 2.0 | 3 | 9 | 3 | | 2006 | Miami Dolphins | 4 | 4 | 81 | 134 | 60.4 | 929 | 6.9 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 150 | 77.0 | 10 | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | | 2005 | Minnesota Vikings | 7 | 7 | 139 | 216 | 64.4 | 1,564 | 7.2 | 6 | 12 | 31 | 169 | 72.0 | 24 | 147 | 6.1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | | 2004 | Minnesota Vikings | 16 | 16 | 379 | 548 | 69.2 | 4,717 | 8.6 | 39 | 11 | 46 | 238 | 110.9 | 88 | 406 | 4.6 | 2 | 9 | 4 | | 2003 | Minnesota Vikings | 14 | 14 | 295 | 454 | 65.0 | 3,479 | 7.7 | 25 | 11 | 37 | 196 | 96.4 | 73 | 422 | 5.8 | 4 | 16 | 6 | | 2002 | Minnesota Vikings | 16 | 16 | 333 | 549 | 60.7 | 3,853 | 7.0 | 18 | 23 | 47 | 244 | 75.3 | 106 | 609 | 5.7 | 10 | 23 | 9 | | 2001 | Minnesota Vikings | 11 | 11 | 235 | 366 | 64.2 | 2,612 | 7.1 | 14 | 13 | 33 | 186 | 83.3 | 71 | 416 | 5.9 | 5 | 16 | 7 | | 2000 | Minnesota Vikings | 16 | 16 | 297 | 474 | 62.7 | 3,937 | 8.3 | 33 | 16 | 34 | 181 | 98.0 | 89 | 470 | 5.3 | 7 | 11 | 6 | | 1999 | Minnesota Vikings | 1 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.0 | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | TOTAL | 1,867 | 2,927 | 63.8 | 22,422 | 7.7 | 142 | 94 | 270 | 1,494 | 89.9 | 484 | 2,536 | 5.2 | 33 | 93 | 38 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:07 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Uh ... last 3 years of his career have 13 TD, 20 INT, 73 sacks - in 18 games. Whatever he was from 2000 to 2004, he hasn't been the same since 2005. Maybe Moss made him what he was, I don't know. But he'd have to have a mega-upside in the "intangible" category to get someone to look past his numbers.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:07 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Don't know much about him but, he is mentioned in the thread. Tim Rattay Source: NFL.Com Tim Rattay Height: 6-0 Weight: 200 Age: 31 Born: 3/15/1977 Elyria , OH College: Louisiana Tech Experience: 8 Seasons
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:11 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Rattay wasn't awful for the 49'ers. But he was never "the guy" either.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:15 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Wow, NEP...I couldn't disagree with you more on those guys.
Garcia has had a pretty good career...playing in the West Coast Offense. The few times he's been out of it (Cleveland) he has been absolutely putrid.
As for Daunte Culpepper, his career ended with that injury in 2005...it just took 3 years for him and the league to realize it. Injury aside, a while back I posted a link to a story that illustrated why he'd be such a bad fit in the Pats offense. In a nutshell it's because he's horrible at staying in the pocket and delivering the throw in the face of the rush.
I'm pretty much on the "it's too late to bring anyone in this season" side of things, but if we do bring someone in, I hope it's not Garcia or Culpepper.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:24 PM
RE: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
If BB was interested in bringing in a new qb, - it would have already happened. We're approaching a quarter of the way through the season, - how much time does it take "to get another qb goin'?" ... Far more time than is left - especially since "we already have a starting qb," - he's just not feeling so hot at the moment.
Last edited 9/26/2008 8:45 PM by Hunter07
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 7:29 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I'm thinking how well Cory Dillon and Randy Moss did after they joined the Patriots. Both came with raps which they overcame. The reality is that if they were going to do something by now, they would have. I do however, think Garcia would do well in NE................
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 9:16 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Garcia takes better care of the football than either Rattay or Culpepper, and he can improvise when things fall apart. Not sure how he'd fit in NE, though - the Pats devote a lot more to putting the team first than anyplace else he's been. But he's tough and quick.
I tend to agree with most everyone else, though, if they were going to get someone it'd have happened by now - certainly before the bye week to maximize the amount of learning that could be crammed in. The only way I can see someone new joining is if it's Vinny or Dougie (who already said "no").
So if that's the case, the next question becomes: is Cassel starting until O'Connell can take over, or is O'Connell really just the #2 guy this year? I think if the next two games go badly, O'Connell will get more and more playing time.
|
|
- thepylons
- Five Star General
- 1168 posts this site
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 9:37 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
matt cassel is not tom brady. that's something that a lot of fans are going to have to reckon with.
but cassel is the guy for this team right now. he needs to settle in, and all things considered, he's been doing a pretty good job of that.
the entire squad (both sides of the ball) were caught flatfooted on sunday against miami. the pats were outplayed, but they were outcoached as well. that's not on the qb.
i'm hoping that new england was just looking past miami and they stepped in a steamy pile of overconfidence.
that can be resolved in short order.
a worse scenario is that the fire is out on defense. age and satisfaction could be a real problem.
but cassel is doing what he's told to do out there. just like brady did when he took the helm.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 10:37 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Of the names mentioned I think the way to look at it is to ask the question "would he be an improvement over Cassel?". I think Garcia would be an improvement. I think Rattay would not be an improvement. And I think Culpepper would be a disaster.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 10:54 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
Typical UsernameNEP, typical.
He throws Garcia out there as a name, which on its face is not a bad suggestion, but he makes not attempt to try to gage the cost and ramifications of those costs. Typical fan boy.
Again you come in with 1/2 an argument. Maybe someday you will present a cogent, well reasoned thought on this board. Maybe.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2008 11:17 PM
Re: (Un)Official Matt Cassel Discussion Thread
I just dont get all the kids gloves with this guy. I never will. Do we forget the game he almost blew that they had to put Brady back in for? Do we forget that while he might have had some completions in the pre-season, he wasnt consistently driving a well stocked offense down the field to score? This offense should not be going down the field and sputtering out, taking field goals. Many of you seem to be fine with this in your support of Cassel and overlooking that this is all he is doing. And get that trash "Culpepper is a good choice" off these boards. Seriously, what are you thinkin?. DC is one of the worst QB's to play the game. He would have not played nearly as long if it werent for Randy Moss' ability to make anyone (except Matt Cassel) look like a great QB. Scrubs like Kerry Collins and those other bums the Raiders have had at QB when he was there even looked good when lobbing it up to Moss for circus catches. Add to that what little he could do after his injury was not good enough for a poor Fins, and Poor raiders team the last few years. He's roadkill.
Rattay.. Meh.
Garcia. He would be a decent choice. But as Stated earlier.. Getting a QB in to replace Cassel, that person most likely wouldnt start for 2-4 weeks. Add on to that, Garcia would not be gotten for a cost worth it to the Patriots for what few games they would use him for at this point. It is too late to bring in anybody the Pats would have to pony up a pick for, or trade a player for.
We are stuck with Cassel. The only thing that I could see them doing is starting one of the other QB's on the roster after the half way point in the season.
|
|