People with sense do care. For example, I predicted on this board before the BT ever added Nebraska that the coming BT plan would be to play at least 9 league games. 

Well before that I told this board that ND would be part of the ACC sooner rather than later.

BitterD wrote: No one cares about your opinion or the UNC football program

WoadBlue wrote:

BrutusBuck11 wrote:

grapie wrote: It just guarantees that members other than Michigan and OSU will schedule home patsies with the remaining games. MSU and Purdue should keeps us on the schedule, but that's about it.

Ill be shocked if the B1G allows its teams to play ND at this point, make em join the confrence or cut em off if they go to 10 in confrence games

ND offended the Big Midwest by offending Mich by canceling. So the Big Ten 'punishing' ND with a new boycott would make Big Ten sense.

The fact is that ND has 0 need to ever play any Big Ten team. ND must remain national in scope, and ND serves all its midwestern needs by playing Home games. No Big Ten games means ND can play more schools in the South, and that is paramount for ND's football future.