Free Trial Ad
Why Subscribe?
  • Player/Prospect News
  • Exclusive Insider Info
  • Members-Only Forums
  • Exclusive Videos
  • Subscribe Now!
InboxChat RoomChat Room (0 fans in chatroom)
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 2  Next >

Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston

Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 12:33 AM

Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


You guys are paying how much to make a lateral move? C-USA, MAC, Mountain West, and Sun Belt has the same shot as the Big East. Would Bosie had been better off to stay put in the Mountain West? Looks like it. Highest ranked team from those 5 conferences will now get an automatic bid to a BCS game if they are ranked in the BCS top 14. 

No conference can send more than two teams. So what comes into play now. After The Big 5 send two teams that leaves room for  2 at large. One will probably be Notre Dame the other will be the highest ranked team from "the Group of  5" whether or not they are in the top 14. 

videos and more articles at this link explaining it all. 
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/862 4387/six-bowls-pool-college-football-semifinal-gam es

From ESPN
The "Group of Five" conferences fought to get automatic access to the six major bowls. It was especially important for the Big East, which has had an automatic berth into the BCS bowls, but in the new system the conference will not have guaranteed access unless its champion is the top-rated among the "Group of Five."


Agreement on BCS playoff structure reached



8:27PM EST November 12. 2012 - DENVER – College football's new playoff system will feature only six marquee bowl games, but will guarantee access to a team from the five non-power conferences, the BCS' presidential oversight committee decided in a brief meeting Monday afternoon.

The presidents also approved the general framework for revenue distribution and gave conference commissioners the go-ahead to secure a TV rights deal.

The smaller conferences known as the "Group of Five" – Big East, Conference USA, Mid-American Conference, Mountain West and Sun Belt – had pushed for addition of a seventh bowl beginning in 2014, when college football moves to a four-team playoff. The Big 12 and Pac-12 also were in favor of the extra bowl, which would have allowed a second guaranteed slot for those conferences' teams. But with little interest from potential TV partners, commissioners ultimately decided against the idea.

"It was a possibility up until the end," said Big East commissioner Mike Aresco of the seventh bowl. "But this was a better plan for us. It gives us the same guaranteed access for our conference champion. We'll work out the revenue. We'll be fine."

The commissioners were also given approval by the presidential oversight committee to secure a TV rights deal. Current rights-holder ESPN is in an exclusive negotiating window that ends later this week, according to BCS executive director Bill Hancock. Sports Business Journal reported last week the network was close to a deal worth as much as $500 million annually and perhaps as much as $7.3 billion over the life of the 12-year contract. But there was at least some sentiment to test the value with potential bidders like Fox, NBC or Turner.

Navigate Research, a Chicago-based firm that measures the value of marketing and media rights, originally estimated the package might be worth from $400-450 million annually. On the open market, Navigate's director of analytics Jeff Nelson estimated the annual value could reach $550-600 million.

"It's clearly very, very valuable," Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Monday.

The current BCS TV deal pays $180 million a year.

Ten percent of total revenue will be tied to teams' academic performance rates (APR). If a team's APR falls below an undetermined threshold, it would lose that portion of the revenue. Nebraska chancellor Harvey Perlman said the portion is expected to be designated for academic purposes.

The question of how the revenue will be distributed has apparently been settled, at least in broad terms. Though presidents and commissioners at the Hyatt Regency would not discuss the terms because they hadn't been finalized, CBSSports.com reported Sunday the "Group of Five" would split at least 20 percent of the overall bowl revenue.

"There will be plenty of money for everybody," BCS executive director Bill Hancock said. "The bottom line is 'more.' "

Northern Illinois president John Peters, who represented the Mid-American Conference, said the vote on revenue distribution was unanimous.

"We think it's fair," Peters said. "It does recognize that some conferences contribute more in a revenue way. … From my point of view for my conference, what it means is more."

Said the Big East's Aresco: "The fairness aspect is definitely there."

More important, according to Peters and Aresco, was the guaranteed access to the six games that will make up college football's upper-tier bowls. Big East senior associate commissioner Nick Carparelli tweeted: "It wasn't about a 7th bowl. It was about a guaranteed spot. It is better for everyone if there are 6 bowls. Mission accomplished! "

Counting future members of "Group of Five" conferences, the Big East champion would have qualified in seven of the past nine years.

Meanwhile, the Big 12 and Pac-12 had pushed for the seventh bowl as a way to secure another guaranteed slot for their teams, like the SEC and Big Ten secured in a recent deal with the Orange Bowl. But Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby noted that in 11 of the past 14 years, the Big 12 had two or three teams ranked in the top 12 of the BCS standings. And Scott said: "It's no longer about access. It's about a four-team playoff."

All six bowls will rotate as semifinals for the playoff. The postseason will feature three "contract" bowls – meaning games with tie-ins to conference affiliations (Rose, Sugar, Orange) – and three "host" bowls – games without tie-ins. Those games will be played New Year's Eve and New Year's Day; the championship game will be played a week later, on a Monday night.

The "host" bowls have not been determined. Hancock said bids would go out sometime after the TV deal is secured and would be finalized by spring 2013, but conventional wisdom is the slots will be filled by the Fiesta, Chick-fil-A and Cotton bowls.

Next on the agenda: finalization of a selection committee – it probably won't happen until next spring – and at some point, a name change:

"Anything," Nebraska chancellor Harvey Perlman said, "but the Bowl Championship Series!"






http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bowls/2 012/11/12/bcs-playoff-presidents-meeting-college-f ootball-denver/1700455/

 

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 12:34 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


And did anyone notice.. The WAC is completely left out. At least they were not mentioned.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 12:39 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


The fight for the at large spot if it was in effect this year is between #19 Louisville and Future C-USA member #20 Louisiana Tech.

Boise made a huge mistake leaving the Mountain West.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/13/2012 7:06 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)




---------------------------------------------
--- herd0ne wrote:

And did anyone notice.. The WAC is completely left out. At least they were not mentioned.

---------------------------------------------

The WAC will no longer have football after the next round of changes. They did away with it when they lost everybody.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 7:37 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


No one left in the WAC
Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/13/2012 10:06 AM

Re: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


They are leaving CUSA for the same reason we left the MAC. More money and the possibility of better exposure. Seeing how our current media package is the worst, they can't help but get better media exposure over on ESPN.
Say what you want, but other than a little more cash in the coffers, our CUSA tenure has been less than stellar. You can't spin it any other way.

We'd do the same in a heartbeat if given the chance. Football can't deliver so we are left in CUSA.

Last edited 11/13/2012 10:07 AM by svherd

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 11:02 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


We would also make the jump to CUSA from the MAC if that chance came up again today.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 1:34 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


Who really thinks the Big East is going to keep the same deal in football they have now?

The C-USA teams are paying what was it? Around 7 million each to leave C-USA and join the BE. Will take a lot of years to make up that money.

Aaron do you really think if the MAC called we would go? Why not call them? They have an uneven number of schools right now.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 1:40 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


Why would we take a step back to the MAC??
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 1:42 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


You are the one that said we would.

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 1:58 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


No i didnt...re read it.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 2:33 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


ok my bad.. I miss read it.

Didn't realize the WAC was folding.

So Louisiana Tech and UTSA is going to C-USA

And I assume the rest Utah State, Idaho, New Mexico State, Texas State and San Jose are going to the Mountain West?

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 3:20 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


Idaho and one of the others are left out in the cold, heard Idaho may actually go back wards to the Big Sky.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 4:46 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


With including the ACC in the "Big 5" conferences, this may finally settle the conference shake ups for a while.  Florida State & Clemson to the Big 12 and Virginia Tech & NC State to the SEC may not happen now that the ACC is going to get a big slice of pie.  (Not that those teams were heading out to the Big 12 or SEC, but an example of the rumors) 

Maybe the re-shuffling is over for a while.

Let's Bring on The MOUNTAINEERS !!!!!!

Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 4:52 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


Very good point. They would be crazy to want to leave.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/13/2012 5:57 PM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (2 votes)


I would say FSU, VT and Miami's reputation is what kept the ACC in the club.

Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/13/2012 10:24 PM

Re: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


I seriously doubt anyone will be leaving the ACC in the near future. The exit fee that all universities had to agree to with the addition of Notre Dame is huge, plus they all want to have that association.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/14/2012 6:42 AM

Re: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston 


Gonna be some whining going on with these schools.
Reply | Quote

Posted: 11/14/2012 8:53 AM

Re: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston 


So much jealousy in this thread. I can't wait for the new NBC or ESPN contract is done. You guys have fun with UNT, FIU and a bunch of start-up schools.
Reply | Quote
Avatar

Posted: 11/14/2012 9:00 AM

RE: Central Florida, Memphis, SMU & Houston Post Rating (1 vote)


where is the jealousy???
Reply | Quote
Reply to TopicPost New Topic
  Page of 2  Next >